J
Jarud
Rock Star
Silver Level
iPoker, Hold'em No Limit - €0.02/€0.04 - 6 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat
Ive been analyzing hands today especially c/betting light and for value with made hands and for thin value on later streets.
Heres a spot I find myself in from time to time, in the example I think I could of played the hand differently, ill explain why I played the hand in the way that I did and then explain another way that has just come to me!
I open 3x in the CO (slightly more than standard for me) as there is a big fish in the BB.,
villian playing at 68/0/3 vpip/pfr/ag 135 hands, (fold to cbet 30) (wtsd 18)
villian min donks the flop which I effectively ignore and bet out about 75% to start building this pot, if villian has connected in any way to this flop I am expecting a call and expect to be well ahead.
I elect to check back this turn because
- I have a decent amount of SDV
- I can induce villian to bluff on the river and consider a hero call.
- If villian checks again on the river I can consider a thin value bet.
I fold this river due to villians relatively low wtsd stat and passive style of play
Another way I could have played this hand is to
- Barrel the turn for fold equity and charge any draws, if villian calls I still have some (although small) equity to improve on,
- I can get still get value from draws with one card still to come
- I can likely check back the river, (unless villian leads the river or check raises the turn)
I guess what im getting at is when i check back the turn it caps my range and invites a bluff??
I haven't given much attention to ranges in this specific example, but if anyone could assist with my thought process that would be great.
thanks
Replay this hand on CardsChat
Ive been analyzing hands today especially c/betting light and for value with made hands and for thin value on later streets.
Heres a spot I find myself in from time to time, in the example I think I could of played the hand differently, ill explain why I played the hand in the way that I did and then explain another way that has just come to me!
I open 3x in the CO (slightly more than standard for me) as there is a big fish in the BB.,
villian playing at 68/0/3 vpip/pfr/ag 135 hands, (fold to cbet 30) (wtsd 18)
villian min donks the flop which I effectively ignore and bet out about 75% to start building this pot, if villian has connected in any way to this flop I am expecting a call and expect to be well ahead.
I elect to check back this turn because
- I have a decent amount of SDV
- I can induce villian to bluff on the river and consider a hero call.
- If villian checks again on the river I can consider a thin value bet.
I fold this river due to villians relatively low wtsd stat and passive style of play
Another way I could have played this hand is to
- Barrel the turn for fold equity and charge any draws, if villian calls I still have some (although small) equity to improve on,
- I can get still get value from draws with one card still to come
- I can likely check back the river, (unless villian leads the river or check raises the turn)
I guess what im getting at is when i check back the turn it caps my range and invites a bluff??
I haven't given much attention to ranges in this specific example, but if anyone could assist with my thought process that would be great.
thanks