Originally Posted by BLieve
Just proving my point fam theres no need to respond if you're not interested.
No look noobsauce, just because someone limps & 4-bets does not mean they have aces the majority of the time. They have a range, and most of that is *not* aces. On top of that, when we have AK they have a reduced number of aces in their range because we have an A in our hand.
If you want an example hand, I have one for you that I just happened to play today.
Ultimate Bet, $0.25/$0.50 NL, $0.10 Ante Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
BB: $17.95 (35.9 bb)
UTG: $14.70 (29.4 bb)
MP: $39.80 (79.6 bb)
CO: $20.45 (40.9 bb)
BTN: $63.60 (127.2 bb)
Hero (SB): $88.15 (176.3 bb)
: Hero is SB with Q♣
UTG calls $0.50, MP calls $0.50, CO calls $0.50, BTN raises to $3
, Hero raises to $10
, 3 folds, CO raises to $20.35
, BTN folds, Hero calls $10.35
: ($45.20) 7♥ 8♦ A♥ (2 players)
: ($45.20) J♦ (2 players)
: ($45.20) J♥ (2 players)
$45.20 pot ($2.15 rake)
CO showed 10♥ 10♦
(two pairs, Jacks and Tens) and won $43.05 ($22.70 net)
Hero showed Q♣
K♠ (a pair of Jacks) and lost (-$20.35 net)
This thread is driving me absolutely nuts. It epitomizes the problems with the HA forum. Threads that are over & solved get tons of retarded replies that add nothing meaningful to the discussion while good threads are passed over because these steaming piles are bumped to the top.