$25 NLHE 6-max: AA on turn in 3bet pot.

Py6eHbl4 87 hands playing 20/16/3.5
lost 1 buyin vs a fish, he 3bet pre with KQo, on flop came 3 diamonds, he had the K of diamonds, he cbets, fish raises and he shoves. fish stacks him off with tp.

few hands later he got it all in pre with TT vs another fish who was playing 50bb, got stacked again.

gimmesome888 79 hands playing 48/21/2. loosing player overall. likes to donkbet when he has something. he is not that important.


$0.15/$0.30 No Limit Holdem
888
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG darkstar.net ($97.93)
UTG+1 TrustMe_ ($45.53)
CO Py6eHbl4 ($30)
BTN CTPEK03A ($41.01)
SB gimmesome888 ($31.18)
BB forsakenone ($31.90)

Pre-Flop: ($0.45, 6 players) forsakenone is BB A:heart: A:diamond:
2 folds, Py6eHbl4 raises to $0.78, 1 fold, gimmesome888 calls $0.63, forsakenone raises to $3, Py6eHbl4 calls $2.22, gimmesome888 calls $2.22

Flop: 5:club: J:spade: 4:heart: ($9.00, 3 players)
gimmesome888 checks, forsakenone bets $6.75, Py6eHbl4 calls $6.75, gimmesome888 folds

Turn: Q:club: ($22.50, 2 players)
forsakenone ??

I check/call.
That turn is a bit of an action killer and puts QQ ahead of us. But fortuntantly the pots bigger than villains stack I think AJ can still call a shove. Add to this that villain likely has KK in his range as the fish is behind him and he's shown in the previous hand he's likely adjusting his range to accomadate fish (3betting KQ).

Shoving is standard here and defo EV+ but he may find a fold from time to time. A more risky approach I'd like would be to check. KK shoves all day so we achieve the same result with them. AJ will check back but is almost certain to call any non K river.

I'd make the 3bet a little bigger. The minimum I squeeze vs 2 opponents is 4x the raise. OOP or vs a fish I make it at least 5x.

bet ~8-10 then shove river, I think shoving may fold out some weaker Jx hands

Jurn8 said:

bet ~8-10 then shove river, I think shoving may fold out some weaker Jx hands

Click to expand...

Ye actually this is probably better than a c/c.