pocketehs
Legend
Silver Level
Didnt want to take away from Alfie's post w JJ and 4 callers but I had a similar hand and wondered what everyone thought. Is this is a fold after the raise on the flop? Just sat at the table but the villain was 67/7/50 after 15 hands (not enough to trust the stats from what I understand)
Here what I was thinking throughout the hand:
Flop: KK is still strong although any player could still have weak aces. so bet for value. once the re-raise from the villain I just call.
Turn: once villain checks after the raise, I dont think I can necessarily say he has a weak hand because hes so aggressive. Check for pot control?
River: still having a hard time trying to decide if small bets are to get to showdown with weak hands like a blocker bet or if its to try to induce me to re-raise. Help here? Either way I think its more likely that Im beat by a set of 2s or 3s or a weak ace.
pokerstars Hand #87342388701: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02 USD) - 2012/10/08 11:51:14 ET
Table 'Amelia' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: HERO ($2 in chips)
Seat 2: CO ($0.80 in chips)
Seat 3: BTN ($1.94 in chips)
Seat 4: SB ($2.01 in chips)
Seat 5: VILLAIN ($1.40 in chips)
Seat 6: UTG ($1.13 in chips)
Seat 7: UTG+1 ($2.35 in chips)
Seat 8: MP ($2.33 in chips)
Seat 9: MP ($2.03 in chips)
SB: posts small blind $0.01
VILLAIN: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [Kc Kd]
Four folds
HERO: raises $0.04 to $0.06
1 fold
BUTTON: calls $0.06
SB: calls $0.05
VILLAIN: calls $0.04
*** FLOP *** [Ah 3d 2c]
SB: checks
VILLAIN: checks
HERO: bets $0.17
BUTTON: folds
SB: folds
VILLAIN: raises $0.17 to $0.34
HERO: calls $0.17
*** TURN *** [Ah 3d 2c] [Qh]
VILLAIN: checks
HERO: checks
*** RIVER *** [Ah 3d 2c Qh] [Th]
VILLAIN: bets $0.08
HERO: calls $0.08
After the flop raise, I played the hand super passively but don't I want to get to showdown as cheap as possible?
Thanks for the help guys!
Here what I was thinking throughout the hand:
Flop: KK is still strong although any player could still have weak aces. so bet for value. once the re-raise from the villain I just call.
Turn: once villain checks after the raise, I dont think I can necessarily say he has a weak hand because hes so aggressive. Check for pot control?
River: still having a hard time trying to decide if small bets are to get to showdown with weak hands like a blocker bet or if its to try to induce me to re-raise. Help here? Either way I think its more likely that Im beat by a set of 2s or 3s or a weak ace.
pokerstars Hand #87342388701: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02 USD) - 2012/10/08 11:51:14 ET
Table 'Amelia' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: HERO ($2 in chips)
Seat 2: CO ($0.80 in chips)
Seat 3: BTN ($1.94 in chips)
Seat 4: SB ($2.01 in chips)
Seat 5: VILLAIN ($1.40 in chips)
Seat 6: UTG ($1.13 in chips)
Seat 7: UTG+1 ($2.35 in chips)
Seat 8: MP ($2.33 in chips)
Seat 9: MP ($2.03 in chips)
SB: posts small blind $0.01
VILLAIN: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [Kc Kd]
Four folds
HERO: raises $0.04 to $0.06
1 fold
BUTTON: calls $0.06
SB: calls $0.05
VILLAIN: calls $0.04
*** FLOP *** [Ah 3d 2c]
SB: checks
VILLAIN: checks
HERO: bets $0.17
BUTTON: folds
SB: folds
VILLAIN: raises $0.17 to $0.34
HERO: calls $0.17
*** TURN *** [Ah 3d 2c] [Qh]
VILLAIN: checks
HERO: checks
*** RIVER *** [Ah 3d 2c Qh] [Th]
VILLAIN: bets $0.08
HERO: calls $0.08
After the flop raise, I played the hand super passively but don't I want to get to showdown as cheap as possible?
Thanks for the help guys!