$2 NLHE Full Ring: Call correct vs villain's line?
So I was playing Zoom, just trying to get into different spots and experiment a little bit.
View hand 1961548
DeucesCracked Poker Videos (http://www.deucescracked.com/?referrer=converter_dc) Hand History Converter (http://www.handconverter.com)
Hero (BTN): $2.45
($0.03) Hero is BTN with 6 <font color='black'>♣</font> 5 <font color='black'>♣</font>
, MP1 raises to $0.06
, 2 folds
, Hero calls $0.06, SB calls $0.05, 1 fold
($0.20) T <font color='black'>♣</font> 6 <font color='black'>♠</font> 3 <font color='black'>♠</font> (3 players)
SB checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets $0.10
, SB folds, MP1 calls $0.10
($0.40) 3 <font color='red'>♦</font> (2 players)
MP1 bets $0.20
, Hero calls $0.20
($0.80) T <font color='red'>♦</font> (2 players)
MP1 bets $0.40
, Hero calls $0.40
Found his flop check/call to be pretty suspect, I was expecting a c-bet or a check raise, hence why I only went half pot.
His turn lead is even more confusing, but seeing as I cant imagine him giving up the betting lead on the flop with a ten or better, I decide to call.
When the ten comes on the river and he bets again, I honestly don't see him betting for value here unless he has a ten, which I doubt. I think with the style of play at these stakes and especially on Zoom that he has to have floated me and tried to turn his hand into a bluff.
Is this thinking correct? And would you have taken a different line?