$2 NLHE 6-max: Playing AQ on A92J4 board and getting raised on river

1c/2c ZOOM 6-max table
Hero (UTG) has $2.27
Villain (MP) has $4.95
Hero is dealt As Qc

SB posts 1c
BB posts 2c
Hero raises to 6c
Villain 1 (MP) calls 6c
Villain 2 (CO) calls 6c
BTN folds
SB folds
BB folds

20c in pot
Flop is 9h Ac 2s

Hero bets 12c
Villain 1 calls 12c
Villain 2 folds

43c in pot
Turn is Jd

Hero bets 30c
Villain 1 calls 30c

99c in pot
River is 4s

Hero bets 54c
Villain raises to $1.08
Hero calls

Did I play this correctly? What do you think of my bet sizing? Should I have folded to the river raise?

Bet sizing is fine and you are probably beat on the river but it is really hard to fold to a minraise but in this case you probably should since there are really no hands that are bluffing on this board and it is pretty obvious you have an ace here.

What bluffs can villain have on this river? The only draw on the flop is a gut shot to the wheel which would be folded on the turn AND that draw got there anyway. Villain would have to turn a hand like A10 into a bluff here and that just does not even make sense. So in conclusion, you have to fold here because there is zero sensical combos that make it to this river and raise that you beat unless villain lost his mind after calling down with pocket 7s or something else highly unlikely.

EDIT: To be honest, I think river is a check call at best since you are not likely to get called by many worse hands.

Yeah now that I look back on it, I should've just folded to the river raise, or even check-called the river. If the villain had a hand like AT, he would be calling the river bet, not min-raising it. The min-raise at microstakes is usually a sign of a very strong hand, especially given how most 2NL players don't show much aggression and tend to be calling stations.

In this case, the villain had AJ (2 pairs), which makes sense when I look back on the way he played (he didn't want to raise the turn because he could've scared me off and missed out on value on the river).