This is a discussion on $2 NLHE 6-max: NLH2 Should I have folded here? within the online poker forums, in the Cash Game Hand Analysis section; $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
Hero (BTN): 103 BB
SB: 111 BB (VPIP: 30.51, PFR: 15.23, 3Bet Preflop: 5.36,
CO calls 1 BB, Hero raises to 4 BB, fold, fold, CO calls 3 BB
Flop:(9.5 BB, 2 players) 6♥ 3♠ 4♥
CO checks, Hero bets 7 BB, CO calls 7 BB
Turn:(23.5 BB, 2 players) 5♥
CO checks, Hero bets 10 BB, CO raises to 21 BB, fold
CO wins 52.5 BB
I think he had a wide range. He was playing very loose and went bustoa short after
Should I have folded? Thanks in advance for any input!
22nd October 2017, 4:40 AM
Board is very wet and we have the possibility of hitting a flush on river and reevaluate, I check the turn. Easy fold to the raise even if he's loose. Limp calling range contains a lot jxs, qxs, kxs imo.
22nd October 2017, 5:33 AM
Poker at: PokerStars
It is quite probable that he (CO) was with a straight
22nd October 2017, 8:45 AM
re: Poker & $2 NLHE 6-max: NLH2 Should I have folded here?
I would agree that you should've checked on the turn. Your opponent could've hit a flush or straight: there 9 heart cards left + 6 non-heart deuces/ sevens - 15/46 cards. Considering he is loose/aggressive him hitting flush/straight is a definite possibility as his range is likely to include weak aces and low level connectors, maybe one-gappers.
On the other hand your only chance to improve was hitting a flush on the river with 10 as your best card which can't guarantee that it would be the best flush.
22nd October 2017, 2:24 PM
Yes, you all are totally right, should have checked the turn....much better move and like you say, the only card that makes me stronger is 10h...
one of the many reasons i am a fish/donk/suck at poker is my desire to not look weak. this led to me trying to "bluff" and losing my dear money hehehehe