Maybe I was taking it somewhat personal in my other post, but I don't see how my most recent post was personal. And xdeucesx, I didn't say I was better than him haha. I agree a lot with what he says, but some things I don't.
The only reason why KK has such massive equity in your range analysis is because you added all combos of 1010-QQ, which I have already explained multiple times is super unrealistic. We have a decent sample size over him; he's 3-betted 5% over the past 374 hands. QQ/JJ are top 3% of hands, and for him not to be 3-betting them vs our BTN open, and then CRing them on the flop instead is questionable. He might do this with 1010, but even then that 3-bets a lot pre. And when he does flat 1010, I don't think he CR that many remaining combos of them.
Against a flop CR range (I think I'm being a little generous):
KK: 50.2%
[AJcc, A9cc, A2cc, J9cc, T9cc, T8cc, 99, 98cc, 97s, 77, 22] + [4/12 combos of A9o, 1 combo of TT, 2 combos of bluff-raises/spazzes/random stuff like AJo/middle pair]: 49.8%
For a 4-bet flop shoving range, my range I gave him is:
KK: 38.26%
[99, 77, 22, AcJc, Ac9c, Ac7c, Ac2c, J9cc, Tc9c, Tc8c, 9c8c, 97s]: 61.73%
I think you're being way too generous with his 4-bet shoving range if you think KK is ahead of it. I don't think anyone is ever CRing A9o/J9ss/J9hh/J9dd without clubs, for example, on this board and 4-bet jamming over the PFR's 3-bet when the PFR has an extremely strong range for doing so, without some sort of strong history/dynamic between the two players.
I think the range you gave him for flop CR would be a good reg's CR range at a minimum of 50/100NL with good aggression levels. For a 2NL player who is not positionally aware; is generally way more passive than the strong regs higher up who can read, understand, and play back at certain ranges; and has a low AF, your flop CR range is too wide. And even if it were true, his 4-bet flop shoving range is not the same as his flop CR range. I'm sure KK will be at the very minimum a slight dog against his 4-bet/stack-off range.
With his new range for CRing flop, I think calling down reasonable runouts (unless he bombs the river on a complete blank) is > 3-bet/calling off or shoving the turn. 3-bet/calling off or shoving the turn massively reduces our equity against his range. It's pretty optimistic to be thinking that he'll stack off with hands like J9s with no clubs, A9o with no straight draws, etc when we 3-bet the flop and especially when we raise the turn. And if he's making random spaz plays with stuff like middle pair/AJo, we allow him to get away from those hands, making our equity drop even further.
I don't really care if you think I'm 100% wrong, and that my advice is bad. Yeah, it could be true to some extent, or totally true. But saying that I should be an adult and accept when I'm wrong, and following that up with saying I shouldn't be playing this game, is going pretty overboard. For a coach that should be encouraging and teaching other players, that seems pretty out of line. It doesn't matter how good you are.