$2 NLHE 6-max: 2pair on a flush board?

S

Salmon5

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Total posts
79
Chips
0
pokerstars - $0.02 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com

BTN: 90.5 BB (VPIP: 50.00, PFR: 50.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, hands: 2)
SB: 235 BB (VPIP: 20.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
BB: 95.5 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
Hero (UTG): 166.5 BB
MP: 101 BB (VPIP: 28.57, PFR: 14.29, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 7)
CO: 125.5 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 1)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Ad Qc
Hero raises to 3.5 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls 2.5 BB

Flop : (7.5 BB, 2 players) 3d Qd 5d
BB bets 2 BB, Hero raises to 7 BB, BB calls 5 BB

Turn : (21.5 BB, 2 players) Ac
BB checks, Hero bets 10 BB, BB calls 10 BB

River : (41.5 BB, 2 players) Kh
BB bets 40 BB, fold

BB wins 40 BB
 
blueskies

blueskies

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Total posts
3,646
Awards
9
Chips
316
As played I would call.

He likely does not have a set unless he somehow played KK like that. A flopped set would likely have raised on the flop to protect against the flush. And even assuming he played a flopped set so stupidly and passively on the flop AND turn, he would likely check call a small set on the river rather than lead out the river.

Again, if he has KK then I roll my eyes and comfortably mark him as a losing player.

I also don't think he has a flush. You have Ad, so it's not like he's sitting on the nut flush where he can afford to give extra cards. A vulnerable flush would have raised your small bet on the turn IMO even if he slowplayed it on the flop.

Now if he does not have 2 diamonds then you're afraid of JT with likely one diamond. But is he dumb enough to keep calling against an UTG raiser with only a middling flush draw? Remember, JT did not even have a straight draw until the turn.

So that leaves what I believe he has, and that is QK. He hit his Q on the flop and completes the two pairs on the river. Perhaps he even has the Kd.
 
Beanfacekilla

Beanfacekilla

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Total posts
4,966
Awards
1
Chips
1
blueskies said:
As played I would call.

He likely does not have a set unless he somehow played KK like that. A flopped set would likely have raised on the flop to protect against the flush. And even assuming he played a flopped set so stupidly and passively on the flop AND turn, he would likely check call a small set on the river rather than lead out the river.

Again, if he has KK then I roll my eyes and comfortably mark him as a losing player.

I also don't think he has a flush. You have Ad, so it's not like he's sitting on the nut flush where he can afford to give extra cards. A vulnerable flush would have raised your small bet on the turn IMO even if he slowplayed it on the flop.

Now if he does not have 2 diamonds then you're afraid of JT with likely one diamond. But is he dumb enough to keep calling against an UTG raiser with only a middling flush draw? Remember, JT did not even have a straight draw until the turn.

So that leaves what I believe he has, and that is QK. He hit his Q on the flop and completes the two pairs on the river. Perhaps he even has the Kd.
Click to expand...

I really like this analysis. I like the way you think sir.

:cool:
 
Full Flush Poker
Top