$100NL, gobble gobble eat up the dead moneys?

Table is sort of on the passive side... my image is fairly TAG, have only shown down good hands. No huge read on Count, except I have seen him limp EP with small-medium pairs but also with K9o, Q8o type junk, haven't seen him limp-re-raise or otherwise limp with a big hand.

Like? No like?

full tilt poker Game #2212215652: Table Dove River - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 22:23:38 ET - 2007/04/14
Seat 1: SirJaz ($92)
Seat 2: 420iceman ($45.40)
Seat 3: ak907ak ($59.75)
Seat 4: slobodon55 ($46)
Seat 5: CountdeMonet88 ($100.25)
Seat 6: MinorChord ($101.50)
Seat 7: BobbyBadBeat ($40)
Seat 8: combuboom ($75.55)
Seat 9: levanakl ($64.85)
SirJaz posts the small blind of $0.50
420iceman posts the big blind of $1
BobbyBadBeat posts $1
The button is in seat #9
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to combuboom [3h 2h]
ak907ak folds
CountdeMonet88 calls $1
MinorChord calls $1
BobbyBadBeat calls $1
combuboom raises to $7.50

No like - there's no need to play 32 at a 9-handed table. Although if you are going to play it, you should of course raise like you did.

Well, it's gutsy to say the least

I think for me, 32 is too low to make this play. At least with something like 67s, it can result in some strong hands. Even two pair/trips with 32 is going to be a little bit on the weak side. Not only that, but we've still got 4 to act behind us and aren't even guaranteed the button...I dunno, I'm liking this less and less the more I think about it.

Ya...your hand's way too weak for me...I'd wait for 55+ or like 56s+ minimum to make this play. I think any decent player will know this is obviously not AA/KK or whatever, and might play back with a medium pair or big ace.

Maybe I'm just too soft to try plays this ballsy, but that's me

I agree that I don't particularly like doing this with as low as 32s, but I was looking for a spot, because players had been putting a lot of dead money out there. Also between the table's passiveness and my image being tight enough, I was pretty much certain I was not going to get played back at without a really legitimate hand. I'm pretty sure a medium pair would have only called and I could have taken the pot from them the majority of the time.

A bit more in my defense: it was actually 8 handed; seat 4 had just sat in, and was not dealt. So I was on the CO... not "guaranteed" the button, but pretty damn close. It gets kind of obvious if I only do this on the button.

That being said, I'm still not sure if I like it either, which is why I posted it

i do this occasionally. you either take the dead money, are checked to on the flop and take the money on the flop, or set your image up as a MANIAC or some such and get paid off later. not to mention sometimes when you flop a monster and they either have a 2nd best hand or try to steal the pot.

With the button and blinds to act and a possible big pair limiping to re-raise... I don't like it.