Originally Posted by c9h13no3
Just checking to see if I understand how this conversation is going so far:
1) You post a thread with no stats or reads.
2) After someone asks for stats or reads, you say "he was kinda fishy".
3) Later, you reveal he was running 23/12 over ~20 hands which is closer to tight than fishy.
4) You complain when someone calls you out on your poor stat & read communication.
Sound about right?
1) Because there was really no good reads and there still is a discussion to be had without them.
2) Yeah, he was kind of fishy, can't get too specific of reads on a anti hud anonymous poker site
in less then 20 hands unless villain is very active.
3) Just because someone is tight, does not mean they are not a fish. At this point I need to ask if you even play poker?
4) Never complained and I am working with what I got, a vague read on a small amount of hands, hence why I didn't even include it in the OP. Only thing I complained about is your constant shit posting in the HA forums.