$10 NLHE 6-max: I'm IP with TT facing a min 4bet
Villain stats = 18/16 over 109 hands with a fold to 3bet of 100% (2 hand sample size).
I 3-bet assuming that the limper would fold and that there was a high likelihood that the villain would as well. 16% PFR puts villain's range at something like: 33+,A3s+,KTs+,A7o+. So my TT should be pretty solid against villain if he calls.
But he 4bets a tiny bit over double my 3bet. This narrows his range but I'd assume without having any other information to the contrary that if he had KK or AA he'd 4bet bigger than min.
1) Do you think that's a valid assumption?
2) My thinking in calling was that I had position, I only had to call a relatively small amount to see the flop, and I could evaluate my options after the flop. I don't want to show any more PF aggression and risk having to put even more money in PF or have to fold. What do you think about that line of thinking?
Merge - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
Hero (BTN): $10.15
SB posts SB $0.05, BB posts BB $0.10
Pre Flop: (pot: $0.15) Hero
UTG raises to $0.28
, CO calls $0.28, Hero raises to $1.27
, UTG raises to $2.75