ConDeck
Visionary
Silver Level
HH20151004 Klinkenberg #2 - $0.05-$0.10 - USD No Limit Hold'em
pokerstars Zoom Hand #141725598856: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2015/10/04 16:26:25 WET [2015/10/04 11:26:25 ET]
Table 'Klinkenberg' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: <Denis888GR> ($10.07 in chips)
Seat 2: sho4499 ($11.82 in chips)
Seat 3: makicchi ($12.34 in chips)
Seat 4: ConDeck ($18.31 in chips)
Seat 5: KojackOLN ($11.22 in chips)
Seat 6: nickolarse25 ($10.07 in chips)
sho4499: posts small blind $0.05
makicchi: posts big blind $0.10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ConDeck [Tc Th]
ConDeck: raises $0.20 to $0.30
KojackOLN: folds
nickolarse25: folds
<Denis888GR>: raises $0.60 to $0.90
sho4499: folds
makicchi: folds
ConDeck: calls $0.60
*** FLOP *** [6h Td 3h]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: bets $0.93
ConDeck: calls $0.93
*** TURN *** [6h Td 3h] [Ts]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: checks
*** RIVER *** [6h Td 3h Ts] [8d]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ConDeck: shows [Tc Th] (four of a kind, Tens)
<Denis888GR>: mucks hand
ConDeck collected $3.64 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $3.81 | Rake $0.17
So obviously I know these spots don't come up that often but when they do maximising value is key and this seems to be a hand type I struggle with according to a review of various quad hands on HM2.
Other than raising the flop to get more value in the middle, which didn't really seem the best play in a 3b pot as it folds out all Ax hands that bet the turn and from the few stats I had on villain he was pretty aggressive, should I be leading this turn and river? I feel like very few tens are in my range here so any over pair bets for value when checked too here along with some Ax bluffs and maybe even underpairs. Same goes for the river, hence the check....
The sick thing is villain had AA, which is why I feel leading turn and river would have been better in this spot but wanted your guys opinion against his entire range. How do you play this hand?
pokerstars Zoom Hand #141725598856: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2015/10/04 16:26:25 WET [2015/10/04 11:26:25 ET]
Table 'Klinkenberg' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: <Denis888GR> ($10.07 in chips)
Seat 2: sho4499 ($11.82 in chips)
Seat 3: makicchi ($12.34 in chips)
Seat 4: ConDeck ($18.31 in chips)
Seat 5: KojackOLN ($11.22 in chips)
Seat 6: nickolarse25 ($10.07 in chips)
sho4499: posts small blind $0.05
makicchi: posts big blind $0.10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to ConDeck [Tc Th]
ConDeck: raises $0.20 to $0.30
KojackOLN: folds
nickolarse25: folds
<Denis888GR>: raises $0.60 to $0.90
sho4499: folds
makicchi: folds
ConDeck: calls $0.60
*** FLOP *** [6h Td 3h]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: bets $0.93
ConDeck: calls $0.93
*** TURN *** [6h Td 3h] [Ts]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: checks
*** RIVER *** [6h Td 3h Ts] [8d]
ConDeck: checks
<Denis888GR>: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
ConDeck: shows [Tc Th] (four of a kind, Tens)
<Denis888GR>: mucks hand
ConDeck collected $3.64 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $3.81 | Rake $0.17
So obviously I know these spots don't come up that often but when they do maximising value is key and this seems to be a hand type I struggle with according to a review of various quad hands on HM2.
Other than raising the flop to get more value in the middle, which didn't really seem the best play in a 3b pot as it folds out all Ax hands that bet the turn and from the few stats I had on villain he was pretty aggressive, should I be leading this turn and river? I feel like very few tens are in my range here so any over pair bets for value when checked too here along with some Ax bluffs and maybe even underpairs. Same goes for the river, hence the check....
The sick thing is villain had AA, which is why I feel leading turn and river would have been better in this spot but wanted your guys opinion against his entire range. How do you play this hand?