$10 NLHE 6-max: 170bb - Full House on Turn Facing Aggression vs Bad Player

Villian Stats (VPIP/PFR/AF): 80/16/2

Interesting hand v Bad Player who had cbet 40bb a few times when checked to / shoved 100bb over cbets a few times
I wouldn't normally call with J10 from the SB but was trying to play as many pots deep with Villian.

I don't like my flop call, in real time my thinking was that he tends to spaz out when shown weakness.

888 Poker - $0.10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: 100 BB (VPIP: 32.86, PFR: 20.00, 3Bet Preflop: 15.38, hands: 71)
UTG: 313.3 BB (VPIP: 26.77, PFR: 19.42, 3Bet Preflop: 6.29, Hands: 393)
CO: 177.3 BB (VPIP: 80.00, PFR: 15.56, 3Bet Preflop: 5.88, Hands: 48)
BTN: 100 BB (VPIP: 21.98, PFR: 15.09, 3Bet Preflop: 7.62, Hands: 235)
Hero (SB): 179.1 BB

Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has J:heart: T:club:

fold, CO raises to 2 BB, fold, Hero calls 1.5 BB, fold

Flop: (5 BB, 2 players) Q:club: T:diamond: J:club:
Hero checks, CO bets 1 BB, Hero calls 1 BB

Turn: (7 BB, 2 players) T:heart:
Hero checks, CO bets 3.3 BB, Hero raises to 12.1 BB, CO raises to 27.5 BB, Hero raises to 59.5 BB, CO raises to 174.3 BB and is all-in,

Hero?

Only crushed by q's of which there is 3 combos and j's of which there is only 1 combo so way ahead of the rest of his range. Would be more inclined to put him on AK, maybe clubs. How mny hands had you played with this guy? From what i can see i cant see myself not calling here.

1. raise flop
2. Call on the turn
3.If CO call Your 59.5bb on the turn what than?

Well, unless you know that this player only goes crazy with the nuts I think you should call here. His VPIP is 80%, he raised pf so I'm thinking AK,AT,AA,KK,QQ,JJ, cant have TT so 4 hand combos that beat you vs 32 that you beat. If you add in the fact he could be going crazy with a FD/total bluff I think you have to call.

$10 NLHE 6-max: 170bb - Full House on Turn Facing Aggression vs Bad Player

You only lose to QQ , JJ, and Q10. pretty standard here to call. Tbh, I would have raised a ton bigger on the 4-bet. Unless you know he's interpreting that as weakness, I would have just made it 90 BB and at that point if he has AK, KK or any another hand he may call with potentially is gonna jam anyway (A10s K10s, VPIP being 80 shit I wouldn't put 910s off of his range).

Its just a little more uncomfortable to get 5-bet jammed on then inducing a 5 bet all-in if he feels pot committed. Why I personally feel this way is because when you 4-bet small for value and get jammed on versus inducing an all-in is because most players are going to know you have a strong value hand, so since QQ is out of your range here, if they have QQ or QT they'll just ship it knowing JJ, JT, and nut flush draws with straight draws are going to call here and all the bluffs or TPTK hands are gonna fold the river most of the time anyway since you're drawing super thin.

As played though against his range you really couldnt go wrong with anything you do here and I call it off and see what happens.

tough one... we get the card we want .. if we are beat so be it.. you played it fine just gii

on the flop we dont want to get too carried away in the hand but once turn comes its fire at will

The fact that you posted the hand suggests you were beaten and want to check your thought processes.
Against his ranges of course you are going to gii with a boat every time. If you lost its just a cooler and his reward for playing 80% vpip.... forgetaboutit.