I enjoyed it. I do not like the fact that the players get to find out what was folded despite the delay. I know a player can use it to throw other players off in the long run....I just don't like it. I'd also rather have Daniel replace Antonio.
I enjoyed it. I do not like the fact that the players get to find out what was folded despite the delay. I know a player can use it to throw other players off in the long run....I just don't like it. I'd also rather have Daniel replace Antonio.
It's not that I didn't like Antonio. He was fine and I did appreciate his break down on certain hands. I didn't like him trying to be funny like Norman. Felt forced. Daniel's take is just.....I don't know how to say it....deeper?Really? Daniel is awesome, especially in his segment with Poker Brat... but the Magician did an OUTSTANDING job in commentary. He pretty much flawlessly predicted everything that was going to happen in sequence, and then provided analysis on WHY these decisions were being made. That would be especially helpful for those who are not as familiar with hold'em a more casual audience he did a spot on job. (Not saying Daniel wouldn't do the same thing by the way, just thought Esfandiari wasn't all that bad, + his chemistry with the guys was good too!)
Really? Daniel is awesome, especially in his segment with Poker Brat... but the Magician did an OUTSTANDING job in commentary. He pretty much flawlessly predicted everything that was going to happen in sequence, and then provided analysis on WHY these decisions were being made. That would be especially helpful for those who are not as familiar with hold'em a more casual audience he did a spot on job. (Not saying Daniel wouldn't do the same thing by the way, just thought Esfandiari wasn't all that bad, + his chemistry with the guys was good too!)
It's not that I didn't like Antonio. He was fine and I did appreciate his break down on certain hands. I didn't like him trying to be funny like Norman. Felt forced. Daniel's take is just.....I don't know how to say it....deeper?
Really? Daniel is awesome, especially in his segment with Poker Brat... but the Magician did an OUTSTANDING job in commentary. He pretty much flawlessly predicted everything that was going to happen in sequence, and then provided analysis on WHY these decisions were being made. That would be especially helpful for those who are not as familiar with hold'em a more casual audience he did a spot on job. (Not saying Daniel wouldn't do the same thing by the way, just thought Esfandiari wasn't all that bad, + his chemistry with the guys was good too!)