or3o1990
Legend
Silver Level
I'm not understanding why PS would claim that regular winning players are bad for the economy of their site. It doesn't make sense to me. They pay rake like everyone else and even more so I'm assuming. I can see how it would be bad if the recreational population was decimated, certainly. This might seem to be happening to a degree from some people's perspective but I would think that American recreational players not being able to participate is the true hindrance. Is it possible that this has offset the ratio of regs/recs and as reactive in nature as we are some site operators have villainized regs as a result? What is your opinion on this? How can winning players be bad for poker?