who is the best No limit hold'em book writer? And Why?

Best poker author

  • David Sklansky

    Votes: 6 31.6%
  • Dan Harrington

    Votes: 7 36.8%
  • Phil Helmuth

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • Doyle Brunson

    Votes: 4 21.1%

  • Total voters
    19
Christianello

Christianello

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Total posts
100
Chips
0
In my opinion David Sklansky is a genius(in his books he explain the math behind poker),second very far from sklansky "Action Dan" Harrington
 
t1riel

t1riel

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 20, 2005
Total posts
6,919
Awards
1
Chips
16
Ring Games: David Sklansky
MTT Tournaments: Dan Harrington
 
reglardave

reglardave

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Total posts
2,264
Chips
0
For beginners to intermediate players, I'd have to go with none of these: Phil Gordon and Tom McEvoy are both excellent for basic strategy. For the more experienced, Dan Harrington.
 
KMC1828

KMC1828

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Total posts
2,162
Chips
0
Harrington is by far my favorite player. i think hes the best mtt player as well
 
Christianello

Christianello

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Total posts
100
Chips
0
dan harrington is a good guy who knows the game but in my opinion is too "rigid"even in his explanation of theories i prefer sklansky cause he focused more on adaptation!
 
M

mbs777

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Total posts
47
Chips
0
don't read the no limit holdem section of doyle's super system 2, every time i read it, i would lose my bank roll
 
R

Rockyrd27

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Total posts
12
Chips
0
Harrington made me from a losing player to a winning player in mere days. There's something about his writing that makes it very accessible to new players and advanced players alike. Information in there for everyone.
 
T

TurnipHead

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Total posts
158
Chips
0
I always enjoyed ploughing on with Harrington. I really looked forward to the next bit of his book because it was all so well put together and all made good sense. Gonna order Vol 2 & 3 from Amazon cos you can't seem to find Vol 2 & 3 in the shops in the UK anymore.

With Skanskly (on the shelf now - half way through) I know I'll need to put in that bit more of an effort. It's dry and more of a slog because it reads more like a thesis - it still has some great stuff in it though.

For a breezy, readable romp, ya need ta get yer hands on John Vorhaus's "Killer Poker" and "Killer poker online". Vorhaus has a relaxed, informal approach and really reveals a lot about the psychological ins and outs of playing online poker - top quality!

Doyle Brunson just seemed to be a bit of a big head with his hyper-aggressive style (even though there are still things to learn from his Super System).

Helmuth? Pedestrian writer who brings nothing new to the table.
 
Last edited:
HoldemChamp

HoldemChamp

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Total posts
475
Chips
0
I find myself rereading Sklansky "Tournament Holdem for Advanced Players" over and over. Seemsl like everytime I do I find another bit of information the helps me improve my game.

Super System I refer from time to time. Still good info in some sections of the book. Although, I would prefer a bit more detailed instruction on Razz. I have a league I play in that has 1 Razz game a month and I would like to become better at it than I am now. SS just doesn't go very much into detail on Razz.

I am just cracking into Harrington on Holdem 1st book and it seems like it will become one I will be refering back to often.

And I will even give kudos to the Phil Hellmuth. I have Play Poker Like the Pros and refer back to it often as well.

I really don't have a favorite out of the 4. All of them impart their unique style to the game. I have learned from reading from all of these authors.
 
Christianello

Christianello

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Total posts
100
Chips
0
your perspective on this four writers/players helped my a lot i'll read harrington with more attention maybe i'm wrong about him,even if i prefer Sklansky
 
mikhail

mikhail

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Total posts
2
Chips
0
Sorry guys, have to say Brunson. There are times when you get forced to play and over commit, but there are some easy marks on some tables that more than make up for those loses. I vote Brunson.
 
flint

flint

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Total posts
716
Awards
1
Chips
0
Phil gordon. Why? Because I got a three pack of his books for cheap and actually read them.
 
Top