What are your thoughts on site selection does it make a big difference?
I've been trying out a few sites recently
Its mega convenient to just jump in at pokerstars
due to the sheer volume and that tends to be my bread and butter, But I've come across a couple of gems this month,
aka william hill
Im sure their are loadss of sites smaller ones with huge potential out there so that may be something I explore in the coming months. Does anyone play any less popular sites?
oh yea Anyway My Question was -
Do you think a winning player is a winning player or do you think game selection can hugely come into it since whatever your skill level you can seek out something worse - I know some do this but most players dont do this
I think for cash games sites like sky poker and william hill are great even 888 poker
. Also any smaller sites lesser know for poker like gambling sites, the sit n go's might be slow reg but for cash games Im pretty confident theres a hell of alot of money to be made.
It just seems like a different world,
My honest thought is anyone who watches poker and seriously plays it will have seen pokerstars on tv/youtube and gone to pokerstars to play,
so most of the players on the small sites dont study poker they dont watch poker on tv, or pay much attention to what sites are best for game frequency etc.
interested if anyone applies this strategy 'donk hunting on bad sites'
or whether its just about volume at stars