What is better - No Deposit Bonus or Rake Back deal?
Maybe question seems a bit weird at start, but I'll explain.
I have friend who wants to start playing online poker and I'm going to teach him a little and point him in the right direction.
He doesn't want to deposit as he knows about no deposit bonuses and/or just wants to try to make a lot of money out of nothing.
Now he's wondering if he should get no deposit bonus of 10$/50$/100$ (depends on what he stumbles across) or if he should get a 27-30% rakeback deal and then struggle with freerolls
for some time, but if he win any money from freerolls he would have rake back deal which IMO is not bad.
What's your opinion on this?
How much can rake back help you later or if you're grinding a lot (guess lot, I have no rakeback deal myself sadly).
If any of you also know how hard/easy are freerolls on Full Tilt Poker
(because he wants to join there).
How many people on average, and how many paid places if you're familiar.