CXC said:I've never seen a pro play before...
My online dictionary says that a professional is one who "Engages in a given activity as a source of livelihood". Well, 2.5 million would make my hood quite lively!wsorbust said:His picture's on the wall. He's a god...not to mention the fact he's responsible for the boom...whether he's pro or not is debatable...do you have to apply for membership somewhere or just say "I'm a pro"...? lol
medeiros13 said:I think the irony with Moneymaker is that he's probably a better player NOW than when he won the WSOP. I'm a bit suprised at some of the negative responses toward him. He's sort of the pioneer of the amature player taking the WSOP by storm. After him was David Williams (who ironically was taught by Marcel Luske DURING the main event!) and Steve Dannenman...yet I don't hear people bash either of these players..
bishop05 said:how do you find these on pokerstars again , love to have a view of them!
MrSticker said:I dunno. Did you see Moneymaker on Poker Superstars II? He looked really intimidated by the other pros and got spanked pretty badly. He hasn't made any noise in anything major since 2003. Did he even cash in 2004 WSOP?