Originally Posted by tenbob
No, the initial raiser is an angle shooting ass.
^ this. Definitely this.
Yes, verbal action is binding, but there was
no definitive verbal "action" in this case - you can't take the words out of context.
Plus it makes no sense anyway: if the "call" part was binding then the betting wouldn't have been reopened to the angle-shooting ass to shove all in anyway. And if the "raise" part was binding then unless a minraise was enough to put the angle-shooting ass all in then it makes no sense for him to be turning his cards over.