I wouldn't say limping was the correct play there, even though it worked for you. In most cases someone would raise and get a call or maybe get a 3-bet and then you would be facing the decision to play out of position with a worse hand that only rarely connects. You could also be in those situations where everyone limps after you and that's basically a bingo situation, whoever is the luckiest on the flop takes the chips.
Also, of course people play 89s to hide a monster, but that is way easier to do by calling a raise from the button or maybe defending the big blind because then you already know how many players you're facing. Actually, the reason why I used 89s as an exemple was because the OP was asking about playable hands and I definitely belive 89s is playable, but from an early position you could be just throwing your chips away, since you're probably not going to call a 3-bet or an all-in.
Yes the
1. "everyone limps " is the worst possible scenerio,
2. A raise , not so bad as some will try trappy style ideas here, limp-get raised-3bet , as I'm sure part of the reason for some players folding excessively to utg limp play (i hadn't noticed before, but recently i have, doesn't happen all that often though)
3.a raise followed by 3bet before action comes back to me, either an ideal situation if i was trapping, or easy fold (or even some crazy hero play with 89, but doubtful )
.
of course most of these won't stand up to an all in, i thought it was just 3bet or so, not all in,
.
I was mainly disagreeing that some won't try 89 raise utg, some do it for value against tight players if flop is good, others do it for mind games, deliberately raising either a tag or lag player ahead of them to set long term trap perhaps?
Or even to "sell" a fake image you may be peddling. ...
, maybe I'm just crazy though lmao , that's always a valid reason