Originally Posted by Talking Point
I was told by Storm and JuiceeQ that this site is unreliable and not to count on it for stats.
I cannot see, for the life of me, where it has gone wrong in registering my results. Even if it had missed 10% of my games, people could still see my trend near accuracy.
Could someone let me know why this site is "unreliable" to them?
In this case, I think that the term "unreliable" should not directed at any errors or missing data at Sharkscope. I think it more applies to how the data is so vague. Sure, you can see if a player wins a lot and what level he plays at. But you can't see if he's loose or tight, aggressive or passive, lucky or unlucky.
There was another thread close to this subject a while back. Check it out here: