Proposals for Online Poker Regulations.

dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
We anticipate that at some point the US will legalize, and regulate online poker.

Rather than allow the delay this will cause when all of a sudden a group of non-poker playing bureaucrats are tasked with setting up the regulations of the online game, lets give them a good 'wish list' (if you will) of what we, the players would like to see, as well as what we will be willing to accept.

There most likely will be 2 distinct areas of any regulation. The money aspect of the game, i.e. depositing and withdrawing, and the actual play of the cards.

The Money aspect will require verification of who a player is, and that they are old enough to be doing so legally. I'm ok with the current verification used by the currently active sites. They are helping players set up a financial relationship not unlike setting up a banking account, or brokerage account online. "Prove to us who you are", seems an easy way to describe the process. This works toward the honesty of the game in preventing one shot shysters from gaming the game.

The money part of the legislation will also include a money exchange. Netteller worked well, has lots of experience, and would be ready (most likely) to fill an existing void. For the most part, current credit card regs prevent them from accepting payments from other than an existing customer. This could easily be changed.

The game part gets interesting in how the ergonomics of the game appear to each player. It must include several things (IMHO). Handicapped accommodations like speech and high contrast table options should probably be incorporated into the software. This might end up being optional tho as there may be (I really don't know) existing solutions that work fine.

-4 color deck should be standard.
-Sites should provide tracker style stats on each player, viewable be any player for eah of the players at the table. Doesn't have to be a HUD, but I deserve to know how my villain plays whenever possible.

There are lots of ideas you may have.....
add them here.....
 
alaskabill

alaskabill

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Total posts
1,012
Chips
0
Four color deck is awesome but its not my problem if someone else wants to use two colors and mix up their flush draws. It should be an option like it is now. As for the stats idea, two things: if you were given this would you only want the stats on the current table in this session?

If the sites give you lifetime stats, that's no different than the data mining that nobody likes. If they don't give life time stats how do you keep up your long term history with the villain? Also, why should the poker site have to provide the info because you ( or anyone else, not trying to get personal) are too cheap to buy a hud?

I think the sites should make it clear that huds are allowed, what the rules on data mining are and let people chose for themselves.

For the record, I'm currently playing hudless but I understand and expect that good players will have them.

Edit, my biggest issue is the money. I want to be able to deposit and play five minutes later and if I want to take a hundred or so off to take the wife out to dinner it should hit my account in no later than 24 hours. That's my big wish.
 
Last edited:
Insaneasylm

Insaneasylm

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Total posts
130
Chips
0
Yep to the instant withdrawal. You can deposit instantly you should beable to with draw with in 24hrs.
 
T

tcummo

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Total posts
985
Awards
1
Chips
93
i agree with the four color deck (done a post on this earlier)
don't agree with the hud type thing.
i think there should be on option to play
where hud's are banned as well as allowed.
we should be able to deposit AND withdraw
instantly with a debit card.
 
Charade You Are

Charade You Are

you can call me Frost
Silver Level
Joined
May 9, 2008
Total posts
2,446
Chips
0
Most current bill being considered is H.R.2366

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.2366:

Personally I think this is way to convoluted, but then, IANAL.

No kidding. (the convoluted part, not the anal part):)

Nothing the government does is simple or straightforward. First there are the exceptions (hypocrisy), then there are the special interests (casinos, law enforcement, indian tribes, conservatives), then there's the "rules" that will require MORE bureaucracy to ensure compliance and MORE lawyers to interpret.

I was going to comment further on the bill, but my brain got tied up in knots half way through it.
 
P

pokernut92poker

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Total posts
101
Chips
0
i like the ideas but i think the us government will find a way to destroy this before they can fix it..... history always repeats itself
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
When it gets to the nitty gritty of what legislation the sites must follow, I think one of the many should be complete user accountability.

This would include me being able to find out after the fact who is getting credit for me having joined that particular site, and how much RB they are getting on an ongoing basis. Exact dates and methods of opening, depositing, and withdrawing should be available for a reasonable length of time, say 3 years.

There are so many aspects of the online account game that are similar to, if not exact replicas of opening, and guiding, a self directed IRA, or Trading Account, that financially, those financial instruments and the owner-control of them could offer some serious guidance.

___ Another regulation, affecting players might be unified player naming. While I have several online identities, for poker purposes, I would prefer to have only 1, across all sites. This one will be very contentious, as I know many who want to have multiple accounts at a single site. But in order to have any online game that is secure and dependable, we will need to sacrifice something, and this might be an easy sacrifice.

Unified naming might also make the multiple site issue easier. We 'register' at a single 'naming registry' site, and then via that site, register for multiple different poker sites, without the repeated unpleasant ID issues each different site might require. Problem with this is the Government wanting access to that huge registry of names/ID's. SO THIS ISSUE WILL NEED ADDRESSING!. One way or another, keeping unwelcome government out of our business will be as important as keeping site info about us out of the hands of strangers.
 
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Chips
0
I don`t like four-colour decks. I still play live sometimes and need to be able to retain my ability to read the cards without artificial aids.
 
Tammy

Tammy

Can I help you?
Administrator
Joined
May 18, 2005
Total posts
57,536
Awards
11
US
Chips
1,170
Other than legalizing my right to fund my online poker accounts with real money, and my money being protected the way it is with most 'legitimate' banking transactions (i.e. having recourse if a site fails to pay me within a reasonable amount of time, etc.), I don't want the government to dictate anything about the game. I want to have the choices I had before Black Friday, but with ease of deposit (oh neteller, how I miss thee).

I don't want it dictated what kind of software sites have to use, whether or not I have to use a four color deck (which I hate, btw); stats kept on players, etc. Give the government an inch and they'll take 5,000 miles, putting so many restrictions and "protections" in place that the game will be unrecognizable for US customers.
 
Last edited:
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Chips
0
Other than legalizing my right to fund my online poker accounts with real money, and my money being protected the way it is with most 'legitimate' banking transactions (i.e. having recourse if a site fails to pay me within a reasonable amount of time, etc.), I don't want the government to dictate anything about the game. I want to have the choices I had before Black Friday, but with ease of deposit (oh Neteller, how I miss thee).

I don't want it dictated what kind of software sites have to use, whether or not I have to use a four color deck (which I hate, btw); stats kept on players, etc. Give the government an inch and they'll take 5,000 miles, putting so many restrictions and "protections" in place that the game will be unrecognizable for US customers.

Well put. :congrats:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Well put. :congrats:

At heart, I totally agree. HOWEVER! the reality suggests that the government will have to take a mile to give us an inch.....

You know that they (the government) will demand accountability in the area of player winnings (so they can tax us), ID verification, (so the younguns can't play), and some sort of money laundering policies (so the terrorists can't fund themselves). These things will happen. Those things will directly affect us. Policies about the sites handing of things will not directly affect us. Things like maintaining sufficient funds for a run on the bank (FT), and other proper accounting practices. These things we will not see.

So we need to be cognizant of this and help guide the politico's into proper actions. You know they will see this as a cash cow, and milk it dry. We can not let them milk it to death.


So yeah, I want it just like it was in 2005, when Netteller worked for us, the US. But it ain't gonna happen!

More fresh ideas please.............:cool:
 
deucem

deucem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Total posts
147
Chips
0
Firstly you MUST make a distinction between legalising Poker and legalising online Casino's.
If US players are pushing for legalisation and regulation of online poker then perhaps they should consider getting each and every one of the states on side first and then get them to "push" the cause onto the Federal government.
A major "carrot" for the states could be that deposits and withdrawals be made through the states very own lottery agencies (do they exist?) thus allowing the states to get a small "commission" on each transaction. (Shhhhhh don't mention the word "t - a - x" to Americans)
My thinking here is, if you don't let them in on the action you are less likely to get a "transaction" and you could die of old age waiting for the Feds to legalise poker.
 
Last edited:
Charade You Are

Charade You Are

you can call me Frost
Silver Level
Joined
May 9, 2008
Total posts
2,446
Chips
0
Anyone else think the requirement to investigate and provide a list of "illegal gaming sites" is bs?

If they are licensing sites, then just provide a list of "legal" sites. We aren't talking B&M here. Sites can spring up overnight. Sounds like a boondoggle for some law enforcement bureaucracy and just plain stupid.
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Anyone else think the requirement to investigate and provide a list of "illegal gaming sites" is bs?

If they are licensing sites, then just provide a list of "legal" sites. We aren't talking B&M here. Sites can spring up overnight. Sounds like a boondoggle for some law enforcement bureaucracy and just plain stupid.

Agree. However, this smacks of over regulation, and we know how them republicans will bitch about over regulation. Plus there is the entrepreneurial thing about anybody can start a small business. And any site on the illegal list will just change its name overnight.

While it does sound like a boondoggle waiting to happen, it has to be figured out. Since it seems unlikely (per the rumor mill) that trusted, existing sites will be allowed to start at the same starting gate as say, any existing Vegas B&M casino, there will be a veritable stampede of small sites vying for position. Many will be fly by night scams.
 
pfb8888

pfb8888

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Total posts
1,132
Chips
0
call me a commy but the simplest and safest solution would be a gov't run site
 
Tammy

Tammy

Can I help you?
Administrator
Joined
May 18, 2005
Total posts
57,536
Awards
11
US
Chips
1,170
Commie! ;) Hey, maybe they'll pass a mandate that everyone has to play at least one hour of poker everyday. :D
 
BelgoSuisse

BelgoSuisse

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Total posts
9,218
Chips
0
Belgium is working on a law that would have a serious chance to get approved in the US: in order to get a license to offer online poker, you need to have a license for a brick and mortar casino.

What happens in practice is that the big online poker brands partner up with the existing B&M casinos, and the government taxes the partnerships a reasonable share of their gross gaming revenues.
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Belgium is working on a law that would have a serious chance to get approved in the US: in order to get a license to offer online poker, you need to have a license for a brick and mortar casino.

What happens in practice is that the big online poker brands partner up with the existing B&M casinos, and the government taxes the partnerships a reasonable share of their gross gaming revenues.

Again from the rumor mill...Before BF, Stars and probably TIlt both had deals pending with the Vegas Casino's. They were canceled after BF.

This solves so many problems. Casino's know how to do it right, there will be few 'start up' shenanigans. Before getting a license a new operator would have to show they can do it according to already established State government regulations, which should include all the concerns we will have.

The software will be the key, and interstate, and international play. Crummy software will die its own painful death, and greedy Casino operators will find a bad decision up front will pay dearly in the rear end.
 
P

pokerfreak56

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Total posts
17
Chips
0
yep i agree with the instant withdrawals full tilt could do it so why not others-the last 3 withdrawals from the late f/t were in my account within 10 mins of request

with online poker regs the main problem has to be different countries different tax laws and gambling laws cannot see a way round it anytime soon,the sites will still do whatever it takes to maximise there profits
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pifan

pifan

PiFace
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Total posts
3,333
Awards
6
Chips
0
Why do we need to deposit on each site? Why cant there be a central funding center where we have accounts that we can deposit and withdraw directly from, ship funds to the room we are going to play on at that moment, and ship it back to our account when we finish with that particular session. This would leave none of our bankroll on any site. We could take as much or as little as we needed to play a session at whatever site we wished to play at that moment. Just leaving it in a central fund center. whether it is a bank of our choosing or some site that is governed to do just this task.

This would allow 2 things security for us as players, and a way to keep better track of wins and losses for tax purpoces.
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Why do we need to deposit on each site? Why cant there be a central funding center where we have accounts that we can deposit and withdraw directly from, ship funds to the room we are going to play on at that moment, and ship it back to our account when we finish with that particular session. This would leave none of our bankroll on any site. We could take as much or as little as we needed to play a session at whatever site we wished to play at that moment. Just leaving it in a central fund center. whether it is a bank of our choosing or some site that is governed to do just this task.

This would allow 2 things security for us as players, and a way to keep better track of wins and losses for tax purpoces.

There is the seed of a great idea here, but we want to get online poker back first. A separate money supply and its regulations is what is involved I think, and that opens up a whole different can of worms.
 
Top