neo1200
Rising Star
Bronze Level
My opinion that poker at all not for poor people. You play NL1 or NL1000, in tournaments with bye - other $0,25 or $100, the nervous tension is identical provided that you are able to afford these tournaments. That is, if you are the wealthy person and you can dare $10000 to put on банкролл, you will worry and worry about them no more, than the person with a salary in 10000 rubles will worry for банкролл in $10. A difference only that for identical nervous and time expenditure in the first case you (at best at successful game!) you will receive $5 a gain, and in the second $300. To rise on limits from NL1 to NL 1000 or it is similar in sit-N-gou from 0.25 to 100, the probability theory (remember about tossing of a coin with limited and unlimited number of times) won't give and it will be necessary for time much, more simply and quicker to earn and throw on банкролл in addition. Here before you two players: 1. The person who shivers for the 100 dollars of a bankroll, playing the CIS $1,5 on a bankrolla, at it the mood jumps, he worries, wins, loses and in 5 hours of game which were tired and exhausted by continuous differences of mood, a motionless pose and the screen of the computer receives $10 a gain. 600 rubles. It is worth it? I think, no. Another with under the same conditions receives 100 dollars of a gain. It is worth it? 6000 rubles. I think and. Strongly don't carp at figures, and only I wanted to inform that in poker if it is interesting, it is necessary to start playing at once from the normal sums which besides aren't a pity for losing. Only this way game can justify itself. Agree?