PLO or NLH?

Which is better to play ? Personally I love omaha because you never get bored .

I play them both, and really enjoy in both of them. It’s all depends on my mood, so I can’t really say that I prefer more one than another. Lately I play lots of omaha h/l, but NLH is always there

Love PLO but I suck at it.

muse713 said:

Love PLO but I suck at it.

Click to expand...

Yeah PLO is hard game to win at but is very fun to play always.

My favorite game is PLO 5 cards, because it’s so much fun and always have a lot of action. But most of the times I play NLH because I have better results.

I play NL Hold'em and also never get bored. I mostly play in freerolls, so I prefer NL Hold'em. I have almost never seen Omaha freerolls.

I rather PLO but the PLO8 can get confusing at times trying to figure out how they won the low. Lol.

Of course, the tournament variety isn’t there for Omaha so definitely play more NLH.

A good Omaha player earns twice as much as a good Hold'em player. Just becoming a good Omaha player is two times harder than a good Hold'em player.

I play mostly NLH. Although PLO is fun but still hard for me because there are not many good books or other documents so I just play PLO when I feel boring in NLH.

I like both.
NLH is more aggressive, has more bluffing.
PLO is camler, but there are too many combinations...
They said NLH is more difficult to play)

NL I like it more

Personally, I like Omaha No limited! This is the theme!

I play both, but you have to concentrate more at Omaha

I love both. But the fact is, there are more serious tournaments in Holdem.

i like Omaha and Omaha 8 just like holdem you need to play the good hands, AA or KK without connecting cards are not good to play you need to get your mindset that this isn't holdem. keep the pots small because people will call down to the river because that is where the hand is won most of the time it can get frustrated losing on river when they had nothing on flop don't bet big that's where everyone loses most of there chips or money unless you have the nuts that cant be beaten on river. gl all

I prefer both ��

I like them both, but I prefer NLH because it is simpler and there are more abillities in the game. Omaha is more specific and more limited. NLH is more exciting and its simplicity makes it more interesting!

muse713 said:

Love PLO but I suck at it.

Click to expand...

This is exactly me lol!

Hello.
I prefer NL Hold'em because I have not learned to play other games.

freeisfun said:

Which is better to play ? Personally I love omaha because you never get bored .

Click to expand...

I agree. If I was a poker god, Omaha would have more players than no limit hold'em. Hold'em is far simpler and more boring compared to Omaha. But in this world - the simplest game wins.

PLO is interesting to play but I chose NLH

Both games are very good! I play depending on the mood. For example, if I feel like I'm in tilt in Hold'em poker, then I start playing Omaha. Or vice versa