Originally Posted by SydTheCat
Do you think that having Paul Wasika at your table may have affected why you played bad?
Why I asked that is that I may have been guilty of getting in a pot when I shouldn't have when I had a well known pro at my table (online pro).
I think I was trying to prove to myself that I could play with them, or perhaps I just wanted to get in a hand with them. Not sure.
I actually didn't play many hands when he was in it. I think one hand, I ended up flopping top pair and bet, and everyone folded, Paul was in that hand and he folded.
I just ended up betting when I knew I should have folded when somebody hit the card they needed on the turn, after I knew I was beat. It had nothing to do with Wasicka being at the table.