player tracker software

JeffJaze

JeffJaze

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Total posts
22
Awards
1
Chips
0
i personally think that the player tracker systems that produce a players roi is at best wishful thinking on how bad/good a poker player really is.
i personally last time i saw had a negative20% roi rating on pokerstars, this is without a doubt horrible info to post and or give someone seeking true player ratings!
does it make me such a horrible player when i have aa and get it all in vs 44 and lose to the 2 outer river?
or how about when i flop the nut straight and some maniac shoves on a flush draw and i insta call only to be rivered by a flush?
or when i flop a set and lose to a river straight?
hell, ive even lost while holding 4444 on a 449 flop to someone holding pocket 9s only to see him hit bigger quads on the river.
point im trying to make is if im a 95% favorite when i get my chips all in the pot, only to lose to that 2 or 3 outer river CONSTANTLY on both ftp as well as pokerstars how can you justify a players skill level based on all the constant outdraws they lose to? how can you say someones not a good player when they lose this way every single session they play?
I personally think its kid of harsh and unfair myself. all feedback is wanted and welcome, and thx all for reading
 
P

PokerJoeAAAA

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Total posts
165
Chips
0
Well i wouldhave to say that if your roi is -20% you are losing more then just the few bad beats you are describing. At low stakes you will always see bad beats like you have described, but your roi is based on more then a few bad beats. You need to be honest with yourself and understand that you have some leaks that need to be fixed. GL
PokerJoe
 
Mase31683

Mase31683

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Total posts
1,474
Awards
1
Chips
1
i personally think that the player tracker systems that produce a players roi is at best wishful thinking on how bad/good a poker player really is
I'd say ROI is pretty accurate. That's what you use to determine your edge, so it's a pretty fundamental measurement of tournament poker play.

i personally last time i saw had a negative20% roi rating on pokerstars, this is without a doubt horrible info to post and or give someone seeking true player ratings!
does it make me such a horrible player when i have aa and get it all in vs 44 and lose to the 2 outer river?
Depends on stack sizes and players left. You were definitely gettting in against a bigger stack so depending on the scenario this could be a bad mistake.

or how about when i flop the nut straight and some maniac shoves on a flush draw and i insta call only to be rivered by a flush?
If you checked your BB and flopped it, that's too bad. Otherwise I'm wondering how you got to that flop with a weak hand.

or when i flop a set and lose to a river straight?
Prolly just a beat

hell, ive even lost while holding 4444 on a 449 flop to someone holding pocket 9s only to see him hit bigger quads on the river.
Cold deck from hell

point im trying to make is if im a 95% favorite when i get my chips all in the pot, only to lose to that 2 or 3 outer river CONSTANTLY on both ftp as well as pokerstars how can you justify a players skill level based on all the constant outdraws they lose to?
Quad 4's v 99 was 95%. So you're not getting it in as good as you think.

how can you say someones not a good player when they lose this way every single session they play?
It's most likely not the final hand itself that's causing you to lose, but the hands leading up to that point. If you really put it in good, that's all you can do at that point.

I personally think its kid of harsh and unfair myself. all feedback is wanted and welcome, and thx all for reading
You honestly shouldn't care what others say about you. If you have fun playing then it doesn't matter. If you make money, then again, who cares? Just work on playing better every time

...
 
JimmyBrizzy

JimmyBrizzy

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Total posts
916
Awards
1
Chips
1
numbers don't lie.

maybe your sample size is too low.
 
JeffJaze

JeffJaze

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Total posts
22
Awards
1
Chips
0
the majority that i play is hu sng's and on my hand historys, which i keep to view back, i looked up and discovered on 16 out of 21 all in's i had the best and at that time and still lost, maybe i shouldnt play so much hu?
 
dmorris68

dmorris68

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
6,788
Awards
2
Chips
0
Sounds like you're probably being too results oriented, and/or looking at too small a sample size as lik suggested. Over the long haul, if you're really playing your hands right and getting it all in in a +EV scenario, you'll profit and your ROI/winrate will show it.

Beats are going to happen no matter what. It's variance, and sometimes the downswing is excruciatingly long and slow to turn around. But if you're honest with yourself, chances are you set yourself up for a lot of those losses.

As far as tracking software being worthwhile, of course it is. This is a game of numbers and unless you're Rain Man, there's no way you'll accurately keep up with the amount of stats and calculations necessary to spot your own leaks as well as those of your opponents. Don't blame the software or write it off as useless just because you don't feel successful with it. Maybe you're putting TOO much trust in a cold stat?
 
C

cheermom48017

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Total posts
117
Chips
0
Numbers dont lie, unless you are one of the unluckiest people in the world,in which case maybe poker is not for you.Maybe try horshoes or backgammon.
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

Fully Tilted
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
25,774
Awards
6
CA
Chips
1,023
Sounds like you're probably being too results oriented, and/or looking at too small a sample size as lik suggested. Over the long haul, if you're really playing your hands right and getting it all in in a +EV scenario, you'll profit and your ROI/winrate will show it.

Beats are going to happen no matter what. It's variance, and sometimes the downswing is excruciatingly long and slow to turn around. But if you're honest with yourself, chances are you set yourself up for a lot of those losses.

As far as tracking software being worthwhile, of course it is. This is a game of numbers and unless you're Rain Man, there's no way you'll accurately keep up with the amount of stats and calculations necessary to spot your own leaks as well as those of your opponents. Don't blame the software or write it off as useless just because you don't feel successful with it. Maybe you're putting TOO much trust in a cold stat?

+1 to everything he ^^ said.
I'm guessing you're looking at too small of a sample size.
 
Poker Tracker 4 Review - Poker Tracker Guide
Top