OMG 100NL

zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
Well I was going to get the FPP bonus, make platinumstar again, cash out some, and THEN play 100nl. Well I got the bright idea tonight that maybe I could start playing 100nl now since I'm rolled for it, and then I'll earn the FPPs to clear the bonus faster. Well since I've cut down to 6 tables it's not that much faster, in fact it's probably slower, but I'm getting some good 100nl experience in. Started off with super scared money, but I've loosened up, realized it's still the same game I was beating at 50nl, just double the stakes.


Definitely better players, one claimed to fold AA to a low board when I hit a set, and at 50nl that happened like once in 2 billion hands, but I'm just playing solid positional tight-aggressive poker and it seems to be working. Up like 20 bucks over 350 hands and still playing. Not a ton, but not bad considering I pretty much expect to drop a buy-in or two starting out at a new level. Still a lot more hands to go before I draw any solid conclusions, but so far it's going well. We'll see how it goes as I gradually add more tables.
 
ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
Just way more regs, and they're a little better. I'm not sure I even want to go back to 100nl; it's impossible to keep 12 juicy tables going iirc :/

glgl sir, wish you all the best with the higher stakes.
 
zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
Just way more regs, and they're a little better. I'm not sure I even want to go back to 100nl; it's impossible to keep 12 juicy tables going iirc :/

glgl sir, wish you all the best with the higher stakes.

Well then I figure my goal is to get good enough so that a game full of 100nl regs is juicy to me :).
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Nice. As long as your rolled for it, why not. GL.
 
zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
whee:

pokerstars Game #17788685416: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2008/05/30 - 01:43:53 (ET)
Table 'Kapteynia III' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: kogo ($71.50 in chips)
Seat 2: zachvac ($114.50 in chips)
Seat 3: xaponet ($98.50 in chips)
Seat 4: romo69 ($97.50 in chips)
Seat 5: Highpothead ($91.85 in chips)
Seat 6: Checkmater ($207.25 in chips)
Seat 7: Virus3232 ($85.05 in chips)
Seat 8: seadragon68 ($20 in chips)
Seat 9: fishbets88 ($306.75 in chips)
romo69: posts small blind $0.50
Highpothead: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to zachvac [7h 8h]
Checkmater: folds
Virus3232: folds
seadragon68: raises $3 to $4
fishbets88: calls $4
kogo: folds
zachvac: calls $4
xaponet: folds
romo69: folds
Highpothead: raises $11 to $15
seadragon68: folds
fishbets88: folds
zachvac: calls $11
*** FLOP *** [6d 5s 9d]
Highpothead: bets $21
zachvac: raises $78.50 to $99.50 and is all-in
Highpothead: calls $55.85 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($22.65) returned to zachvac
*** TURN *** [6d 5s 9d] [3d]
*** RIVER *** [6d 5s 9d 3d] [8c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Highpothead: shows [Kd Kh] (a pair of Kings)
zachvac: shows [7h 8h] (a straight, Five to Nine)
zachvac collected $189.20 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $192.20 | Rake $3
Board [6d 5s 9d 3d 8c]
Seat 1: kogo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: zachvac showed [7h 8h] and won ($189.20) with a straight, Five to Nine
Seat 3: xaponet (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: romo69 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Highpothead (big blind) showed [Kd Kh] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 6: Checkmater folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Virus3232 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: seadragon68 folded before Flop
Seat 9: fishbets88 folded before Flop
 
Jagsti

Jagsti

I'm sweet enough!
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Total posts
5,478
Chips
0
I run like super s%$tty at 100nl FR fwiw :(. GL with this Zach.
 
Chris_TC

Chris_TC

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Total posts
925
Chips
0
What's your screen name, Jagsti? Do you ever play 6-max?
I've abandoned FR, because I find it too straightforward. 6-max is more aggressive and more fun.
Over the past few days, I got to play both NL50 and NL100. NL50 is pretty much a big joke, with tons of fish at just about any table. NL100 has more regulars, but when you get 3-bet it's almost always a monster. When you get 4-bet it's KK or AA. Predictability without end. Even at NL200, barely anyone 4-bets you light. I lost quite a few stacks with 5-bet bluffs before I realized that these folks will always call, and will always have KK or AA.
 
Jagsti

Jagsti

I'm sweet enough!
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Total posts
5,478
Chips
0
Chris - Im Duke748 on stars, chk out my Craziness 100nl 6max thread,lol.
 
Top