Four Dogs
Legend
Silver Level
This just happened $1/$2 table at Foxwoods. An under the gun player in Seat 1 with about $500 behind raises to $15 and is 3 bet to $50 by the button a fishy older guy with about $300 who seems to know the dealer and everyone on the floor. The OR calls.
($100) Flop is Qxx. UTG Checks and the button bets $90. UTG doest think too long and shoves all-in. For some reason while the button is thinking the dealer mucks the all-in players unprotected csrds and as he's protesting the older player OTB calls.
The floor is called over and rules that the all-in player (who claimes to have had QQ for a flopped set) cannot win the hand and must call the $90. The button however (who showed KK) complains that because he called the All-in (but only as a freeroll) he should win the other $200 he had behind too. Really? Considering how lucky he was to have won the pot at all this struck me as extreamely poor sportsmanship.
What are your thoughts? Did the floor get it right or did the button have a right to the entire stack regardless of whether or not its fair?
($100) Flop is Qxx. UTG Checks and the button bets $90. UTG doest think too long and shoves all-in. For some reason while the button is thinking the dealer mucks the all-in players unprotected csrds and as he's protesting the older player OTB calls.
The floor is called over and rules that the all-in player (who claimes to have had QQ for a flopped set) cannot win the hand and must call the $90. The button however (who showed KK) complains that because he called the All-in (but only as a freeroll) he should win the other $200 he had behind too. Really? Considering how lucky he was to have won the pot at all this struck me as extreamely poor sportsmanship.
What are your thoughts? Did the floor get it right or did the button have a right to the entire stack regardless of whether or not its fair?