look at this graph

stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Chips
0
ok a friend sent me this graph, it is not his but he wanted to know what I thought.

here is my origional opinion, the guy is a nit. As you see he is very very tight and his aggression is horrible. He is a basic calling station, I like that he is tight in his blinds but hate how his aggression in $1 NL river is so high. he is a basic calling station, any other opinions?
 

Attachments

  • graphs.JPG
    graphs.JPG
    44.5 KB · Views: 42
B

bw07507

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Total posts
2,219
Chips
0
It looks like its working for him. My guess for the huge River agression is that he is slowplaying big hands to the river a lot, and then betting hard. It is very strange though, I dont think Ive ever seen an AF that high on any one street. Although it is a fairly small sample size at 100NL.
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Chips
0
bw07507 said:
It looks like its working for him. My guess for the huge River agression is that he is slowplaying big hands to the river a lot, and then betting hard. It is very strange though, I dont think Ive ever seen an AF that high on any one street. Although it is a fairly small sample size at 100NL.
Click to expand...


yea question isnt if its working or not but how to we classify him. I think Nit and Nits usually do win very slowly, told buddie he must just be on a heater or sorts.
 

Attachments

  • real graph.jpg
    real graph.jpg
    67.8 KB · Views: 31
Last edited:
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

HELLO INTERNET
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Total posts
12,422
Chips
0
The only thing that really stands out is the 3% PFR (lol) and low blind steal %s. The huge AF at $100NL is surely just a sample size-related discrepancy, although in general flop AF% will be greater than turn AF% which will be greater then river AF%.

Rest looks reasonable, if not optimal, assuming he plays full ring of course (if this is 6-max then either he has hilariously awesome game selection or is on a huge heater, heh).
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Chips
0
Dorkus Malorkus said:
The only thing that really stands out is the 3% PFR (lol) and low blind steal %s. The huge AF at $100NL is surely just a sample size-related discrepancy, although in general flop AF% will be greater than turn AF% which will be greater then river AF%.

Rest looks reasonable, if not optimal, assuming he plays full ring of course (if this is 6-max then either he has hilariously awesome game selection or is on a huge heater, heh).
Click to expand...

you dont think the total aggression factor is too low?
 
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

HELLO INTERNET
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Total posts
12,422
Chips
0
Yeah, a little. It doesn't stand out nearly as much as 3% PFR though. :p

Basically he looks like a pretty standard type of player who is repeatedly calling without odds and/or is c/c'ing with strong hands out of "fear of being outdrawn" or suchlike. Hence the river AF% being higher - he can't be outdrawn on 6th street, so he finds his bet/raise button.

Of course this is all just educated guesswork - there's only so much one can infer from a 15k stat sample at 2am. :eek:
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Chips
0
Dorkus Malorkus said:
Yeah, a little. It doesn't stand out nearly as much as 3% PFR though. :p

Basically he looks like a pretty standard type of player who is repeatedly calling without odds and/or is c/c'ing with strong hands out of "fear of being outdrawn" or suchlike. Hence the river AF% being higher - he can't be outdrawn on 6th street, so he finds his bet/raise button.

Of course this is all just educated guesswork - there's only so much one can infer from a 15k stat sample at 2am. :eek:
Click to expand...


nice explanation.
 
ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
I thought ~<1 AF was passive, ~1-2 AF was approaching aggressive and 2+ was considered aggressive?

Either way, as mentioned, it seems like this guy is a) a nit who doesn't raise enough PF, and b) either slowplays to the river way too much and/or draws a little too much, and hits a lot :p
 
B

bw07507

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Total posts
2,219
Chips
0
From the graph, it looks like he is on a real heater, it doesnt look like there is ever a downswing of more than a buy-in which seem very unrealistic to me. Maybe he really is that good though.
 
Top