This is a discussion on limit tournys vs n-limit wins within the online poker forums, in the General Poker section; Does anyone here agree with me that limit tournaments are easier to win than no limit????
Does anyone here agree with me that limit tournaments are easier to win than no limit????
13th February 2006, 10:26 PM
cant say that i've played more than like 5 limit tourneys
the first one i played was a freeroll on absolute poker and i placed like top 10...beginners luck; i bet i couldnt do that now
i guess it's easier not to bust (no easy bust w/ a bad all in call)
but its also alot harder to bluff. Thats where my limit play sucks...i'm used to NL and can't stand not bluffing with a big bet or all in
so i dunno i guess it depends on the kind of player you are...some prefer L to NL
13th February 2006, 10:40 PM
Online Poker at: Pokerstars
re: Poker & limit tournys vs n-limit wins
I like to play limit and agree with you it is way easier to place. sometimes you gotta bluf to the river re-raise the river and if you get re-raised call. lmao most likely you'll lose but limit is not really a bluffing game when you are playing idiots and/or idiots.
14th February 2006, 2:40 AM
Originally Posted by holduplaya
when you are playing idiots and/or idiots.
But even not playing idiots, there's less bluffing in limit I would think because you often can't bet enough to force your opponent out of the pot. (I'm new to limit, so I don't claim to be an expert)