Legal Poker in All States

F

Fastone2

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Total posts
565
Chips
0
Its ironic, that as adults, we allow the government to control our ability to play poker as we may want to.
How did this happen? Why cant adults play poker together in their own homes. Without the Government in our personal business? It can be legal if they find a way to tax us. Right?
I am not encouraging anything illegal. However, I am confident that some of the Governors will be pressing President Trump, to lift some of the unnecessary restrictions for us all to play poker with less difficulties. I really hope so....
Good luck at the tables.....:)
 
TheNutz4You

TheNutz4You

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Total posts
3,740
Awards
4
US
Chips
105
they feel the need to protect us from ourselves, and want to be able to tax it is the main reason
 
Iryna Stryzheuskaya

Iryna Stryzheuskaya

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Total posts
2,802
Awards
10
BY
Chips
151
Each person must decide whether to play him or not. I'm against prohibitions.
 
wilpinsi

wilpinsi

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 11, 2013
Total posts
1,321
Chips
0
We live under the yoke of the law for anything and not just gambling, when they are taxed and governments are able to visualize a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, they can pass laws and release everything, be it cigarettes, drinks, games,
prostitution, everything generates around tax collection,Well... that's the way
 
MrPokerVerse

MrPokerVerse

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Total posts
2,825
Awards
2
Chips
57
Not sure of the question regarding playing together in your home? There shouldn't be any restrictions for a home game for money. If this was an online related question, that opens things up considerably for debate.
 
vitalii029

vitalii029

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 10, 2017
Total posts
649
Chips
0
I also hope and expect that they will find a way to make poker legal in our country, I really want to play live poker and not to leave the country
 
Z

zannie27

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Total posts
86
Chips
0
My thing is not so much playing in every State but it pisses me off that a lot of the sites I played at before the ban won't let me play because I'm American.. Not to mention a lot of them were and still are way better than the ones they left US players to settle for.
 
sryulaw

sryulaw

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
May 12, 2017
Total posts
920
Chips
0
in a way living in third world parents has your advantages lol!
 
F

freestocks

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Total posts
2,351
Chips
0
Just don't mention gambling to the teller at the bank when depositing the poker checks.
 
A

AlexTheOwl

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Total posts
860
Chips
0
Why cant adults play poker together in their own homes.

In many states they can, including mine (CT). They just can't make a business out of hosting poker games. You could work to change the law in Michigan.

http://www.pokerdiy.com/faq/home-poker-law

However, I am confident that some of the Governors will be pressing President Trump, to lift some of the unnecessary restrictions for us all to play poker with less difficulties.

States set their own laws. Home poker, cardroom poker, or both are legal in most states. online poker is fully legal, regulated, and taxed in NJ, NV, and DE. Other states are free to join this list.
 
king11682

king11682

Kimba
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Total posts
4,016
Awards
24
VE
Chips
311
It is truly an injustice that everyone should have the power to decide and not that others decide for you. should consult the entire population
 
R

Rational Madman

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 11, 2017
Total posts
2,478
Chips
0
States set their own laws. Home poker, cardroom poker, or both are legal in most states. Online poker is fully legal, regulated, and taxed in NJ, NV, and DE. Other states are free to join this list.
1ln51x.jpg

Yeah that must be why Washington forced ACR BOL etc to provide to the whole world and all 47 obedients states in usa but to exclude only those three states that had a backbone
 
C

cheeeer

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2017
Total posts
984
Awards
6
Chips
81
It is truly an injustice that everyone should have the power to decide and not that others decide for you. should consult the entire population

goverments of almost all countries never do it.
 
A

AlexTheOwl

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Total posts
860
Chips
0
Yeah that must be why Washington forced ACR BOL etc to provide to the whole world and all 47 obedients states in usa but to exclude only those three states that had a backbone

You are a fountain of ignorance, and today you are overflowing.

The Federal UIGEA law bans poker sites from taking deposits, making it effectively illegal to operate a poker site in the USA, although not to play on one.
http://www.legalpoker.com/uigea/

ACR is based in Costa Rica, BOL in Panama. They follow the laws of those countries, not of the United States.
It is debateable whether these companies, and other offshore sites like them are violating U.S. federal law. It's a gray area, and these are sometimes called "grey market" sites.
ACR's CEO, Phil Nagy, an American, has said on Twitch that he has not returned to the USA in many years due to legal concerns.

There is an exception to the UIGEA for sites authorized by law, such as the ones serving New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware. Those states passed laws making certain sites legal, so the federal UIGEA law does not prohibit those sites.
The federal government has not attempted to shut down online poker in these states. There is no "obedience" or "standing up to" or "backbone" involved. States are welcome to make online poker legal if they want to. Pennsylvania, Illinois, and California have all recently debated legalizing online poker too.

The U.S. federal government does not ban anyone anywhere from playing poker online.

But some states do. ACR does not take players from those states. That's 43 states, not the 47 you claim, where ACR accepts customers.
https://americascardroom.eu/us-players-welcome

Poker sites in the three states where it is fully legal are licensed, regulated and taxed. Those three states (not the federal government) have chosen to make it illegal for sites not licensed in those states to offer poker. ACR and BOL are not licensed in these states. So they are among the seven states where offshore sites are explicitly illegal.

ACR has chosen to honor the state laws, and does not offer poker in those seven states. BOL takes players from anywhere.

The UK also licenses and taxes poker sites:
https://secure.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PublicRegister/Search?Search=&Sector=GamblingSoftware

You will not find ACR or BOL on that list of licensed companies. They are grey market in the UK also, just as much as in the USA.
 
Last edited:
cranberry

cranberry

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Total posts
1,588
Awards
4
Chips
0
Poker is banned in Russia since 2009! The ban concerns the organization of the games on money, but does not affect the players themselves. In the off-line poker can be played in specially designated gambling zones :(.
 
D

don1980

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Total posts
361
Chips
0
Online gambling is a world wide. Why would the US banned poker while other countries still have the privilege to play. They should quit treating online poker as a business and more like a sport.
 
R

Rational Madman

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 11, 2017
Total posts
2,478
Chips
0
You are a fountain of ignorance, and today you are overflowing.

The Federal UIGEA law bans poker sites from taking deposits, making it effectively illegal to operate a poker site in the USA, although not to play on one.
http://www.legalpoker.com/uigea/

ACR is based in Costa Rica, BOL in Panama. They follow the laws of those countries, not of the United States.
It is debateable whether these companies, and other offshore sites like them are violating U.S. federal law. It's a gray area, and these are sometimes called "grey market" sites.
ACR's CEO, Phil Nagy, an American, has said on Twitch that he has not returned to the USA in many years due to legal concerns.

There is an exception to the UIGEA for sites authorized by law, such as the ones serving New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware. Those states passed laws making certain sites legal, so the federal UIGEA law does not prohibit those sites.
The federal government has not attempted to shut down online poker in these states. There is no "obedience" or "standing up to" or "backbone" involved. States are welcome to make online poker legal if they want to. Pennsylvania, Illinois, and California have all recently debated legalizing online poker too.

The U.S. federal government does not ban anyone anywhere from playing poker online.

But some states do. ACR does not take players from those states. That's 43 states, not the 47 you claim, where ACR accepts customers.
https://americascardroom.eu/us-players-welcome

Poker sites in the three states where it is fully legal are licensed, regulated and taxed. Those three states (not the federal government) have chosen to make it illegal for sites not licensed in those states to offer poker. ACR and BOL are not licensed in these states. So they are among the seven states where offshore sites are explicitly illegal.

ACR has chosen to honor the state laws, and does not offer poker in those seven states. BOL takes players from anywhere.

The UK also licenses and taxes poker sites:
https://secure.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PublicRegister/Search?Search=&Sector=GamblingSoftware

You will not find ACR or BOL on that list of licensed companies. They are grey market in the UK also, just as much as in the USA.
In time you will see that things are not quite as they appear but not totally opposite either.

You are correct that the laws are the laws but you don't know truly what the meaning is behind.

For example, easy to say 'of course all countries outlaw murder' but why some will legalize euthanasia but others not? Why some will legalize abortion and yet make euthanasia illegal.

Tell to me the logic... It's whatever the corporations funding the parties feel benefits them more.

It's why euthanasia is always an option in almost all countries of private healthcare but much less commonly legal with public so on and so forth.

You think it's all about honesty and written words, it's a game like poker actually and you are being semi-bluffed 24/7.
 
Top