re: Poker & Hand History Audit
I 2nd FP JL TB Dork.
All panal members must be able to dispassionately and analytically critique the a body of work without casting judgment on one or two questionable hands.
They must remain proffessional and refrain from disparaging comments which may be seen as insulting or lacking purpose.
They should be relatively well read and have a strong enough knowledge conventional poker strategy
to take various playing styles into consideration.
While appraising someone elses play, the betting patterns and behaviors of opponents must be considered.
Notice to anyone thinking of submitting a session for review. If your feelings are easiliy hurt, don't.