Experience vs aggressiveness.

do you think weighs more in a game of poker, a person with more experience and more quiet or a person more aggressively without fear of betting, I acreditomais on aggressiveness, I think she scares the opponents.

good in my opinion but the players with experience but has a lot of advantage because they already have all this qualities together to learn to play keto, aggressive and bet on certain hours

Experience 100%

Aggression, experience and luck are the most important conditions for a successful poker game!

wouldn't experience lead to knowing what spots to be more aggressive in?

Not everything is won only with aggression.

You need to reassess the scenarios and adapt to the players.

Undoubtedly, experience is always more important. Any player can be aggressive, but one of ten is experienced.

Hello! I think one aggression is not enough for a good game, at a certain stage it is possible, but when meeting with an experienced player it will fail

The experience without doubts. In general an experienced player can win in one hand what an agressive wins in 5 with less risk.

Of course experience. An experienced player knows how to play with aggressive opponents and passive ones. And he can play aggressively too. In my opinion, the most important thing in poker is the ability to adapt to your opponent

you have to be an aggressive player to win, players are afraid of aggressive players and therefore often fold

If u have experience u can Play aggressive as well sometimes .

A person with experience and calmer a thousand times, for the simple reason that the aggressive can make mistakes several times and the calm take advantage.

Experience is one of the most important things in poker and nothing can replace it. Aggresiveness is good thing but should be applied at the correct time and versus correct type of opponents. As with everything balance is very important here.

neptun1914 said:

Experience is one of the most important things in poker and nothing can replace it. Aggresiveness is good thing but should be applied at the correct time and versus correct type of opponents. As with everything balance is very important here.

Click to expand...

I agree!!!!:burnout:

I think that experience is a decisive factor for winning poker !!! An experienced player will always know how to beat an aggressive player since over time he adapts to the aggressive style of the opponent’s game !!!

Hello Cards Chat Grinders,

I think there is a relationship between the two. Good play demands some amount of aggressive play and with that aggressive play you will find yourself in certain situations that experience can and will be the difference between being profitable and busto in the long term. Thanks for the post.

Good Luck To All

There is a name for players that try to be very aggressive without experience. Fish.
They can an advantage over others inexperienced too tight players, but will will lose for better ones.

Definitely the experience, because if you have it, you will know how to read the plays of aggressive players. Then if the aggressive has experience is another matter

Aggression at the right time is very valuable, but it can get you in trouble many times.

Experience is something you gather with a lot of work and patience. It is a high quality skill and it is irreplaceable, so it can make the critical difference in the game. Aggresiveness alone it can be impressive and can lead you to a level, but the results are not sure and stable.

Exp + luck = Win