Check possessing the Nuts

R

RANDERSAA

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Total posts
10
Chips
0
Good evening, what did you think of the Brazilian player's Atiall by just checking out the nuts on the river?
 
R

RANDERSAA

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Total posts
10
Chips
0
I'm really sorry the question was meaningless.
The player in question was Yuri Martins.
The following hand: The opponent opens in MP and Yuri no Big just pays.
Flop K 8 T without flush, Yuri check and the opponent bet, Yuri pays.
Turn A, both DAO check.
River Q. No flush possibility
Yuri bets pot and the opponent triple the bet.
Then Yuri so pays by holding J for a sequel T to A. And the opponent was only 8 and 6, having only a pair of 8.
So my question about it and if it was just this call from Yuri being that he was nuts? Being that the opponent was not all in and possessed many tokens still.
Or if it gets featured collusion
 
MrPokerVerse

MrPokerVerse

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Total posts
2,825
Awards
2
Chips
57
Looks like they did miss value. Interesting to hear if he commented on that hand. I wouldn't be to quick call collusion though.
 
puzzlefish

puzzlefish

🙉 🙈 🙊 student of the donk arts
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Total posts
4,432
Awards
3
CA
Chips
275
That is odd. He has the winning hand. He has nothing to lose by raising. Yuri either made a mistake or there was something going on between him and the villain.
 
Top