One of the biggest Bad Beat at the WSOP today, what do you think?

midgetfactory

midgetfactory

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Total posts
936
Chips
0
Ouch, thats gotta hurt haha
 
pescaofish

pescaofish

Academic Poker
Loyaler
Joined
Nov 8, 2013
Total posts
2,027
Awards
10
PA
Chips
97
Amaizing but In my opinion I dont think is a Bad Beat since both hands where monster hands. A bad beat will be if she losses to a bad hand. :deal:
 
starting_at_the_bottom

starting_at_the_bottom

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Total posts
2,665
Awards
1
Chips
7
I would be inclined to categorise this as a cooler.
 
mar_dragan

mar_dragan

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Total posts
1,032
Chips
0
The title should be best hand on wsop,or one of the greatest hand ever on wsop.
Can you explain me why is this bad??
 
olfabiolo

olfabiolo

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Total posts
324
Awards
2
Chips
0
The title should be best hand on wsop,or one of the greatest hand ever on wsop.
Can you explain me why is this bad??

This hand refers to one of the largest bad beat at the WSOP that occurred in 2005. Of course are two extraordinary hands, but have been a Bad Beat.
 
Mr Alvim

Mr Alvim

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Total posts
342
Chips
0
Wow, this is a hand that would leave me without playing poker for a while lol
 
detroitjunkie

detroitjunkie

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Total posts
826
Awards
4
Chips
0
the bad beat was qq losing to 89 suited, which was 4-1, not the worst beat ever. the 89 suited was actually 2nd best hand you can have against qq (as a dog that is duh)

The cooler came with the board, very bad, but not the worst in wsop. A few years ago there was quads losing to royal flush - thats a tough one too

I do not remember where this was in the tourney so can not comment if it was worst time ever to have this type of hand happen.

all in all pretty crappy, and yes it does rank up there in worst ever loses
 
WSOP
Top