The best thing to happen to online poker in the last year is...

silverfox432

silverfox432

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Total posts
382
Chips
0
synchronized breaks... Debate?
 
C

ColonelAce

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Total posts
9
Chips
0
Synchronized breaks are convenient that's for sure, but the rush poker is the best thing that's happened IMO.
 
Lilli3

Lilli3

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Total posts
142
Chips
0
I agree, Colonel. Rush poker is my favorite, at least.
 
T

thejuanupsman

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Total posts
409
Chips
0
I agree with you fox.

I'd put Rush as one of the worst things to happen.
 
H

Henreiman

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Total posts
560
Chips
0
Rush looks super fishy, super fun, super fast. But in reality, it's pretty much a crapshoot. Not only do you have to adjust your entire strategy, but its impossible to get stats on a person and/or tell if they are just getting too attached to their blinds/chips or just holding super good cards. Everyone complains about bad beats, and the rush poker set up only perpetuates it.
 
C

cAPSLOCK

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
2,550
Chips
0
Though it has little effect on me, I'd think the reorganization of minimum buyins on cash tables was very significant.
 
J

jimmyjames1713

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Total posts
18
Chips
0
Synchronized breaks was a great implementation
 
natsgrampy

natsgrampy

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Total posts
4,489
Awards
2
US
Chips
113
From a players convenience stand point synchronized breaks is the best implementation. Just think back to when breaks were after 1 hour of play and if you were playing several different tables, you never really got a "break" to get up and walk away for whatever.
 
B

BigBelle

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Total posts
139
Chips
0
Synchronized breaks only affects tournament players and really would only help tournament players playing numerous tourneys at the same time. If rush poker brings more inexperienced players into the game then that would be a better innovation IMO.
 
atlantafalcons0

atlantafalcons0

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Total posts
3,713
Awards
1
Chips
4
Rush looks super fishy, super fun, super fast. But in reality, it's pretty much a crapshoot. Not only do you have to adjust your entire strategy, but its impossible to get stats on a person and/or tell if they are just getting too attached to their blinds/chips or just holding super good cards. Everyone complains about bad beats, and the rush poker set up only perpetuates it.

I agree with this statement. Rush poker is a crapshoot.

Best thing to happen in the last year is the green and purple colors in the Full Tilt Lobby. :p
 
M

Madness_does

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Total posts
425
Chips
0
I think the best thing to happen in poker is our idiots in office are finally getting there head our of there ass and coming closer to legalizing online poker for Americans, so we can in effect take back the market and maybe we can get a fair game.

And rush poker is a trip, but I think it should be called RAKE poker, but they do have 2 rush poker free rolls per day, just so you all know.
 
U

umpinpa22

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Total posts
172
Chips
0
rush poker on ftp!

been playing rush poker for about 4 months now and really enjoy the fast pace ! one can play a lot more hnads per hour and acquire ftps much easier gla at rush poker! very up and down though good days bad days!;)
 
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Chips
0
Synchronized breaks only affects tournament players and really would only help tournament players playing numerous tourneys at the same time.


That would be me then, and I like synchronised breaks. The only downer is that not all sites have picked up the idea yet.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Though it has little effect on me, I'd think the reorganization of minimum buyins on cash tables was very significant.

This.

The death of the SS, at least on FTP, gets my vote.
 
Monoxide

Monoxide

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Total posts
3,657
Chips
0
deaths of SS's on FTP and rush poker pretty much changed my life in january

so that wins
 
pfb8888

pfb8888

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Total posts
1,132
Chips
0
This.

The death of the SS, at least on FTP, gets my vote.

suprize ...suuprize....suuuuuuprize

my vote is clearly -- RUSH ---
- i dont play due to slow connection but the idea was brilliant

an idea for the future? how about limit / no limit?
-limit preflop /nolimit postflop?
 
Last edited:
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
5
My comming of age and depositing online ofcourse.
 
silverfox432

silverfox432

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Total posts
382
Chips
0
As a T player Synchronized breaks does it for me playing 4 or 5 T's all with different breaks was a pain.

Rush is good fun but will it be around in 5 years? IMO its just a way for FT to increase the Rake reciepts
 
C

Colonel

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 3, 2010
Total posts
6
Chips
0
Synched breaks = +1

Rush poker = -3

IMO, rush poker amounts to a game of math. And since I suck @ math, I can't stand it. Much prefer making my decisions based on:

The actions of the other players @ my table = 65%
The cards I'm holding = 25%
Other factors (my aching back, intuitions, twitchy fingers) = 10%
 
psy0nyd3

psy0nyd3

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Total posts
929
Awards
1
Chips
31
For me the #1 best thing thats happened is the addition of shallow tables. Without them I wouldn't have this tiny bankroll.

#2 would be synchronized breaks I hate missing hands to piss.
 
B

Bovinity

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Total posts
526
Chips
0
Rush is pretty interesting, and it's great for rakeback whores! But it's difficult for me to get into it.
 
Top