Being result oriented. Embrace it and win!

L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
I've been doing some thinking recently and it finally hit me, "When you fight your biology, you lose."(Lord of War, 2005)

It's in our blood to be result oriented. What we need to do in order to be successful poker players, or successful at anything really, is change the way we perceive results. Especially the 'bad' ones seeing as they are always in abundance no matter what journey you decide to partake on.

Henry Ford didn't exactly hit it out of the park when he was founding Ford Motors and creating the engine to compliment the first series of affordable automobiles for the average American citizen on a massive scale. This man, for whatever reason, was not swayed in the slightest and stayed the course. There was lots of trial, error and failure (negative result), but in the end he went down in history as a pioneer and revolutionary with his name on practically every other car on the road.

Ben Hogan wasn't born with an inate ability to swing a golf club better than anyone who ever walked the face of the earth before him. He practiced religiously and was not discouraged despite the outcome of a session or game. Again, there was lots of trail, error and failure (negative result), but in the end he went down in history as golfs elite of the elite. Today, his swing is taken for granted and perceived by those in the know as the basic's of golf swing fundamentals.

Albert Einstein once said, “It's not that I'm so smart , it's just that I stay with problems longer .” What do you know, the man disproved Aristotle's theory of gravity, proved that light doesn't always flow in a straight line and created a theory (The Theory of Relativity) that, once proven against scrutinizing dismissive adversity, is so complex that it was discarded and essentially buried because the the global population census is too dim witted to comprehend it. There was lots of trail, error and failure (negative result), but in the end he went down in history as one of the smartest and influential men toward mankind to ever live.

These men never empowered the negativity of their results associated with their conquests to hinder the progress they were destined to ultimately make. They created their own destinies as we all do. Had they succumbed to the many bumps in the road, their fates, along with mankind's, would have forever been altered. Even more admirable is how these men accomplished these feats with no blue prints to follow. We in the poker world have a plethora of information readily available to us all to take from the well.

The blunt irony of the matter is that the accomplishments of these men is actually something that should be taken for granted, "If a man does not use his intelligence, he will be lead to slaughter like an animal" -Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf. There's nothing admirable about them. However, it's essential to take that train of thought and couple it with a sense of entitlement and responsibility. Einstein's quote briefly, yet indirectly touches on this. If these men were alive today, I'm sure they would say, "I just did what I had to do".

As a poker player the amount of "bad beat's" or negative results are infinite. You will never be able to escape them no matter how good of a player you are. It is up to you to train your mind to view these things positively. These negative results shouldn't necessarily make you feel good per say, but rather reassured.

You should experience the same reassurance after negative results and bad beats that Henry Ford, Ben Hogan and Albert Einstein did each and every time they; added a new part to a car or engine and failed, tried placing their hands and aligning their bodies with the golf club differently to make proper contact with the ball and failed, or experimented with a new mathematical equation to prove/disprove a theory and failed. They were motivated by the negative results to improve and recognized that if it weren't for their failures their successes would be limited to say the least.

These men were motivated by the constant negative results because with them came change. Positive change. Bad beats are no different.

When someone suck's out on you then you should be elated. This means that you are playing the game better than your opponent and are making all the right decisions. It should be the biggest ego boost of all time. Each one should make you more patient. You should be hungrier and hungrier as you start to lick your chops. You should take joy in your opponents misguided confidence as you have just exploited it successfully. I can assure you that these statements, should you take them to heart, are far from rhetorical idealism unlike the American constitution.

Though money is a way of keeping score in poker, it should be the last thing on your mind when you play."What make's me so good is that I can bet $500,000 on a bluff and I just don't care" -Phil Ivey. Poker sessions aren't about making money. The Pro's will delude you into believing that it is.

Poker is about making the correct decisions at the poker table and exploiting other people's mind's as yours is the more capable, stronger willed of them all. As long as you've played your A game at the table, regardless as to what you walk away from the tables with that day, you should feel like a winner. Playing your A game is a positive result and the only result that matters long term. "I know that if I put in the time that at the end of the year I'm going to end up winning" - Phil Ivey

It's all about perception.

Lastly, I leave you all with this, "Reading is not an end to itself, but a means to an end." -Adolph Hitler Mein Kampf

Are you destined for greatness?
 
dwolfg

dwolfg

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Total posts
583
Chips
0
Some pretty good points, but I am confused as to the point and why you decided to include the Hitler quote.
 
TheKAAHK

TheKAAHK

CardsChat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Total posts
5,275
Awards
8
CA
Chips
857
Is it just me, or is the OP a great essay about how and why to not be results oriented?
 
TheKAAHK

TheKAAHK

CardsChat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Total posts
5,275
Awards
8
CA
Chips
857
i was thinking the exact same thing

Ok, so I'm not crazy.

I mean, I can see OP's point, but I think that the title does not match the post. Henry Ford, if he was results oriented, would not have just shrugged off his failures, he would have given up. He noted his failures, but did not orient himself to them. He shrugged it off and moved on with his plan.

As a winning poker player, if I were to look at a bad session with a results oriented mind, I would think that I had done wrong, lose my confidence, change my style and thought process, and continue to lose more. By not being results oriented, I am able to shrug off those losses and continue with a winning formula.

And before you get the wrong impression, I thought your post was excellently written and thought out. It is good food for thought.

Just think the title does not match the content is all :D
 
Last edited:
cjatud2012

cjatud2012

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Total posts
3,904
Chips
0
Great post! Hope you have many more to share!
 
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
@ DWolf - Well the way I see it the man was able to accomplish a hell of alot. I don't agree with his conquest, but you can't be stupid and pull that off.

@ dueces and thekhaa- No you aren't crazy, you're aloud to interpret this however you want to. Actually, you two are prime examples of the entire point of my post. It's all about perception. To be honest I don't know how you two came to that conclusion. If you don't agree with the post, feel free to elaborate and share with us why your perception of this post is what it is. Couldn't hurt.


I will personally be reading this everyday before a session and figured what the hell others might be able to benefit from it if they choose to... if not :)
 
dwolfg

dwolfg

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Total posts
583
Chips
0
liveone, I agree for the most part hitler had brains, but quoting him can damage credibility in some peoples' view. I am sure there is a similar quote from a more respected person that would accomplish the same things.
 
L

Liveone1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Total posts
190
Chips
0
@dwolf - Yeah, you're right. Too late to turn back now! lol

@ Thekahh - Hey dude it's all good. I love opinions. I wasn't being defensive. I'm just trying to get into the freeroll club;)

So far as your view of being result oriented is concerned I see what you're saying and it's really in line with my point which is that a persons perception of results, be they good or bad, is completely subjective.

Bad beat's aren't really bad results at all (my result oriented mind's perception). They only appear to be on the surface. This is what long term variance is all about. So a result oriented mind that understands the true objective of poker can excel based on all results at the table at any given time and process them in a way that improves their game. It depends on your perception of a bad session or a bad beat.

When someone sucks out on you do you say "Damn, oh well he got lucky that time." and keep it moving or do you say "I got him. I outplayed him. I made the right decision. I made him call or push all in with the worst of it.I couldn't be any prouder of myself. I have so much equity coming my way it's unreal. What a great result!:D"

For me, the prior is impossible and I eventually crack when the bad beats push keep picking at me. It starts to sting and I feel like I'm lying to myself (turns out I am). I play best implementing the latter. Not only is it the truth, but it's the level beyond the level beyond the level.This part may be controversial, but the fact is that bad beats really aren't unlucky.

Suck outs represent your opponent getting what little equity they had coming to them. The only reason it hurts so badly is because your opponent doesn't just get 2% of a huge pot, while you take 98%, when they suck out. They take the whole thing.

Prioritizing how different results matter is the key. I'll have $200 in an account and start a blog within 2 weeks to elaborate on all this. I'll be grinding MTT 27 person SNG's. They treat me well
 
Stick66

Stick66

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Total posts
6,374
Chips
0
Good post, but the title is confusing or the OP is confused about it's meaning.

To "embrace" something is to accept/adopt it. Yet the OP says in his post to NOT let the "bumps in the road" change the way things are done if correctly done. Those contradict each other since being "results oriented" is when someone DOES let the bad things change the way they go about tasks, even when they are correct.

Everyone knows:
Being "results oriented" = BAD
Staying true when correct, regardless of results = GOOD

It seems the OP knows the same, but may have picked a bad title. I hope.


(The only reason I nit-pick here is because there are plenty of poker newbies on this forum who may get the wrong idea from this.)
 
alaskabill

alaskabill

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Total posts
1,012
Chips
0
Nice post. While I wouldn't have ended it with a Hitler quote, to each their own.

I try to focus my results orientation on things I can control. If I made a +EV play, that is a positive result. The fish luckboxing his two outer on the river is just noise. If I practice positive BRM that is a positive result. Any time I do something correctly that is poker related the long term result is positive.
The next card is as random as the weather.

Anyways, nice post.
 
Double-A

Double-A

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Total posts
787
Chips
0
Just say "nh" and move on to the next hand...
 
Mortis

Mortis

The Saurus
Loyaler
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Total posts
12,026
Awards
6
US
Chips
704
Some pretty good points, but I am confused as to the point and why you decided to include the Hitler quote.


Hitler was results oriented. And he killed himself.
 
Pascal-lf

Pascal-lf

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Total posts
3,161
Awards
1
Chips
1
Bad beat's aren't really bad results at all (my result oriented mind's perception).

I think this is the main issue - the generally accepted meaning of being results orientated is that focus is placed on the outcome of a specific action, i.e. the result of the hand, not on the process through which the outcome was achieved (getting money in as a large favourite)
 
Top