Originally Posted by IveGot0uts
There is a nuanced difference between lacking in validity and being invalid. I would say that a site that is portrayed as nutter ranting is certainly subject to a need to consider the source. We already have conflict as Mortis says 500 you say 120.
I don't really care enough to further the research, but the point is that the kid was acting as a vendor at an organized event, not a lemonade stand in mom and dad's front yard, where mom and dad get the liability if the child somehow screws up the lemonade making process by thinking the anthrax at home was sugar for the lemonade or some other, and probably more likely, accident.
If you payed attention to what fletchdad said, he said the LICENSE for the lemonade stand would have been $120.. I said the FINE for not having that license would have been $500. There is no "conflict" there.
And since for some reason there question about invalidity of my article, here are some other articles:
It doesn't matter anyway, this year, they allowed the kids to reopen their lemonade stand, as long as it was 100 feet away from where they originally had the stand.
And yes, it's pretty dumb to ask a 7 year old to get a temp restaurant license for selling 50 cent lemonade, no matter where she is selling it.