You have to beat micro limits to advance and be a "good" player? Wrong in my opinion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RamdeeBen

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Total posts
7,745
Chips
0
You have to beat micro limits to advance and be a "good" player? Wrong in my opinion.

Hello everyone.

Now this has been debated before and I’ve had a thread with something simular before.

It’s the theory of “if you can’t beat micros you will never beat anything higher”

Now, I’m not really a lossing player, more break even at the minute with 0.1/0.2 level. I can sit there for hours, playing but long term success at these levels seems next to impossible to me.

Now i know what people are going to say:


“play preminum hands only and play aggresive” – That’s fine because i do.

Problem is, it works on occasions but everyone literally does call a raise with crap. So say after 2/3hours of grinding for example like the other night i was up about $4.00 playing ABC poker. So...you’d begin to think yeah they are beatable however I’ve literrally had callers all over the show pushing down all sorts of crap and luckily mine have held up.

Anyyyway, so you again get a good hand and play TAG only for now to be sucked out when your massive favorite. This only has to happen a couple of times for your profit to now be in the red. So what am i supposed to do? Fold my premnums when showing a profit or something lol? It’s a joke.

Perfect example last night. I had AA and raised 4xBB and yep you guessed it 5 callers at 6maxtable.
Now, would i of got even one caller caller if the money was actually worth something? Proberly not.

Anywaym on the flop comes rainbow and possible straight draw and i knew someone would be holding a straight draw. I tried one last raise to then be re-raised and re-reaised again by others so i folded. 2 left in and at show down one called my raise with something like 8,5 os and one called with A,4. The 8,5 won with a straight.

I asked the guys “why would you call a raise, clearly i had high pair or at least a pair” Their answer? “it’s only 6 cents” True and indeed it’s nothing to fret about but this is the take everyone has on the game at this level. “its only a few cents i’m gonna call”

The point is, this happens 9 times out of 10. A raise at these levels means absolutely NOTHING so how the **** are you supposed to play? The point is, someone 9 times out of 10 will call your raise. Did i get this at a casino playing cash games for the first time ever at 5/10 stakes? No i didn’t and i walked of with over £500 in profit..

So how does peoples theories of if you can’t beat the lowest levels you can’t beat the higher ones. Absolute rubbish to be honest, people just don’t know how to fold or not bothered about lossing a few bucks. At the higher level this would never of got called unless they was holding something decent.

Over time you might just about show a profit but the basic concept of poker doesn't exsist at this level, what am i supposed to do? It happens time and time again it seems pointless. What are your suggestions? Deposit a lot of monies and try luck at higher levels? It's driving me mad trying to build a roll sat there for hours to show a profit and to carry on playing ABC poker etc to then lose 2 of your BIG hands to absolute garbage..i'm really just stuck on what to do.
 
acky100

acky100

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Total posts
3,523
Chips
0
the higher the limits you go the harder they become to beat, theres no magic gap where when you step up a few levels the players become worse, and anyways bad players is where you make your money from, fair enough theres variance but this is never going to change.
 
F

fx20736

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Total posts
2,728
Chips
0
Hello everyone.

Now this has been debated before and I’ve had a thread with something simular before.

It’s the theory of “if you can’t beat micros you will never beat anything higher”

Now, I’m not really a lossing player, more break even at the minute with 0.1/0.2 level. I can sit there for hours, playing but long term success at these levels seems next to impossible to me.

Now i know what people are going to say:


“play preminum hands only and play aggresive” – That’s fine because i do.

Problem is, it works on occasions but everyone literally does call a raise with crap. So say after 2/3hours of grinding for example like the other night i was up about $4.00 playing ABC poker. So...you’d begin to think yeah they are beatable however I’ve literrally had callers all over the show pushing down all sorts of crap and luckily mine have held up.

Anyyyway, so you again get a good hand and play TAG only for now to be sucked out when your massive favorite. This only has to happen a couple of times for your profit to now be in the red. So what am i supposed to do? Fold my premnums when showing a profit or something lol? It’s a joke.

Perfect example last night. I had AA and raised 4xBB and yep you guessed it 5 callers at 6maxtable.
Now, would i of got even one caller caller if the money was actually worth something? Proberly not.

Anywaym on the flop comes rainbow and possible straight draw and i knew someone would be holding a straight draw. I tried one last raise to then be re-raised and re-reaised again by others so i folded. 2 left in and at show down one called my raise with something like 8,5 os and one called with A,4. The 8,5 won with a straight.

I asked the guys “why would you call a raise, clearly i had high pair or at least a pair” Their answer? “it’s only 6 cents” True and indeed it’s nothing to fret about but this is the take everyone has on the game at this level. “its only a few cents i’m gonna call”

The point is, this happens 9 times out of 10. A raise at these levels means absolutely NOTHING so how the **** are you supposed to play? The point is, someone 9 times out of 10 will call your raise. Did i get this at a casino playing cash games for the first time ever at 5/10 stakes? No i didn’t and i walked of with over £500 in profit..

So how does peoples theories of if you can’t beat the lowest levels you can’t beat the higher ones. Absolute rubbish to be honest, people just don’t know how to fold or not bothered about lossing a few bucks. At the higher level this would never of got called unless they was holding something decent.

Over time you might just about show a profit but the basic concept of poker doesn't exsist at this level, what am i supposed to do? It happens time and time again it seems pointless. What are your suggestions? Deposit a lot of monies and try luck at higher levels? It's driving me mad trying to build a roll sat there for hours to show a profit and to carry on playing ABC poker etc to then lose 2 of your BIG hands to absolute garbage..i'm really just stuck on what to do.


I AGREE 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ALSO THE RAKE WILL DESTROY EVERYONE.

There are a lot of probably good players on this forum who are making money at higher levels but at the 2NL/ 5NL/ 10NL level you are not playing Poker.

Let me give you an example.

You paly TAG, VPIP 11/12 with a 10 PFR. You fold like a mother, You are dealt KK UTG. You raise 4xbb (or 6bb). What happens 90% of the time? Everyone folds and you collect the blinds. Then 5% of the time you get a caller and you flop an overpair. You make a small c-bet to price out any draws. What happens? They fold. Now, 2.5% of the time what happens?
You raise get one opr more callers. You flop an overpair on a ragged board. You bet out and get re-raised. Not knowing what you are up against you re-re-raise. Your opp shoves. You now have close to 1/2 of your stack in the pot and have no idea what you are up against. Figguring that now you may be beat but have invested most in the pot you so call. The villain has flopped two pair or a set orand your money is gone after an hour of folding, waiting for a good hand. The final 2.5% of the time you raise pre-flop, get re-raised by a donkey with VP of 45. You 4bet shove and he calls showing A3o. The 1st card on the flop is of course the A and you are done.

These are NOT hypothetical examples; I can show HUNDREDS of examples of this. Then you figure in the rake which is so exorbitant that it makes perfect sense why Full Tilt gave me tons of free money. ($ 145 in bonuses) because they got every penny plus iin rake. I have gotten to the point where I can tell when Full Tilt decides they need to up their take because you will see lots of AA vs AA and AK vs AK hands.

All the books by Harrington, Miller, Sklansky, etc. will do you ABSOLUTELY, UNEQUIVOCALLY ZERO GOOD. They will teach you how to play higher stakes but are useless for the micros and in fact are useless at the $ 1/ $ 2 Casino games where idiots love to call $ 15 preflop raises with J2 "because they feel lucky" and you know what? They are and you're not.

The only way I have figured out to play micros is this. From EVERY Position at the table EXCEPT the button you limp with any pocket pair or suited connector from AKs to 76s or 2 gappers from AQs to 75s. FOLD ALL UNSUITED BROADWAY CARDS INLCUDING AK & AQ. If you make TPTK or two pair you are likely behind if you get resistance and if you are strong you'll get no action. If you are raised a standard amt call unless you hold AA/KK and then 3bet. If the pot is multiway fold everything but AA/KK and then close your eyes and shove. After the flop, you will miss 65-70% of the time so you check/ fold. When you do hit hard you check/ call or check/ raise depending on board texture and opponent. Lead out on the turn regardless of what card hits. If you are raised and the turn did not improve your draw then fold unless you have at least one pair. If you get to the river with one pair then it is check/ fold. If you made the nuts or close to it make a pot sized bet. Don't worry they're going to call.

Don't ever bluff, don't try to 'represent a hand' don't shove with strong draws and remember ANY pair is just one pair. No Limit Hold'em is a game of IMPLIED odds. Your hole cards are only 40% of your final hand so don't lose your stack with them.
 
The Dark Side

The Dark Side

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Total posts
811
Chips
0
I didnt even read this whole thread but I disagree with OP.


If your some beast of a poker monster then by all means play the stakes your rolled for.


BUT if you have trouble with the micros your REALLY foolish for thinking you can beat anything higher.



This reminds me of the thought process Ive seen here at CC a few times. " Maybe I should move up where they respect my raises" Then you find out that theyre still calling but now because they dont respect you.


GL wit that.
 
The Dark Side

The Dark Side

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Total posts
811
Chips
0
oH and the best way to beat the micros is trying to focus on playing some good old-fashioned "solid" poker.

Not limping w pp's OOP.
FOLDING AK? There is another nut around thinking the same way. You guys are killing yourselves.




edit: nvm your the same person.
 
LuckyChippy

LuckyChippy

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Total posts
4,987
Chips
0
FOLDING AK? There is another nut around thinking the same way. You guys are killing yourselves.




edit: nvm your the same person.

Hahahahah sheer class.

This thread and fx are going the way of the rigtards. So sad to see. May they rest in peace.
 
W

wobble

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Total posts
50
Chips
0
Perfect example last night. I had AA and raised 4xBB and yep you guessed it 5 callers at 6maxtable.
Now, would i of got even one caller caller if the money was actually worth something? Proberly not.

You need to raise a lot more at 1c/2c.
Try 10 BB. If everyone is still calling, raise more.

There is nothing better than a table with total lunatics. Sit back, ship it when you have QQ+ and watch as someone calls with two random suited cards.
 
Poof

Poof

Made in the USA
Silver Level
Joined
May 21, 2008
Total posts
14,419
Chips
0
You don't necessarily have to start at 2nl, it would all depend on your bankroll and what you can afford to lose. I personally cannot stand 2nl.(unless it is a CC drunkament, then that's fun)
I still play micros, 10nl and if I find myself on a horrible downswing will drop to 5nl.
 
Last edited:
atlantafalcons0

atlantafalcons0

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Total posts
3,713
Awards
1
Chips
4
Duh, 2nl is rigged.

:p
 
R

RamdeeBen

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Total posts
7,745
Chips
0
You need to raise a lot more at 1c/2c.
Try 10 BB. If everyone is still calling, raise more.

There is nothing better than a table with total lunatics. Sit back, ship it when you have QQ+ and watch as someone calls with two random suited cards.

Well, the point is I'm making if this was a lot higher stakes then you woulden't raise that much would you? It defeats the whole object of raising 3 times? So if you pick up Aces at 150/200 your going to raise 2k?I doubt it, it's never done. It seems stupid. The whole theory which your taught is non exsistent at micro levels because of the small amounts. That's why it leads me to the conclusion you're overbetting then why not just move up the stakes if you're going ot raise the amounts that will be raised in the higher stakes
 
R

RamdeeBen

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Total posts
7,745
Chips
0
I didnt even read this whole thread but I disagree with OP.


If your some beast of a poker monster then by all means play the stakes your rolled for.


BUT if you have trouble with the micros your REALLY foolish for thinking you can beat anything higher.



This reminds me of the thought process Ive seen here at CC a few times. " Maybe I should move up where they respect my raises" Then you find out that theyre still calling but now because they dont respect you.


GL wit that.

Well like i said, i was in a casino the other night and played 5/10 and found it far easier. You can read so much better at where you are. You have zero chance of knowing where you are at micros most of the time. The amount of times when the flop has came and people have gone all-in with basically just the lowest card on the board is un-real. Would this happen at the higher levels? I highly doubt it. No-one is willing to calling a raise 3/4xBB with rubbish but micros its cents so nobbody cares that's my point.
 
Poof

Poof

Made in the USA
Silver Level
Joined
May 21, 2008
Total posts
14,419
Chips
0
^^^I would disagree with that on 5nl or 10nl.
 
LuckyChippy

LuckyChippy

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Total posts
4,987
Chips
0
Well like i said, i was in a casino the other night and played 5/10 and found it far easier. You can read so much better at where you are. You have zero chance of knowing where you are at micros most of the time. The amount of times when the flop has came and people have gone all-in with basically just the lowest card on the board is un-real. Would this happen at the higher levels? I highly doubt it. No-one is willing to calling a raise 3/4xBB with rubbish but micros its cents so nobbody cares that's my point.

you played 5/10? 1k? If you have that much to spend on poker then just play 25 or 50nl. Good luck.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
It isn't necessary to start at the lowest possible level. But you'll find loose players no matter where you begin, and if you don't learn to beat them, you'll have a pretty hard time becoming a consistent winner.

Solid TAG will beat micros. You won't win every session you play or every time you have a big hand. But you will win over the course of a large number of hands, and at a decent rate.

A fair number of micro players do put money into pots with mediocre and poor holdings because it only costs a few cents. And sometimes, they suck out. But most of the time, they are basically donating to the other players. Your odds of winning multi-way pots are lower, but it balances out because when your hands hold up, you win more.
 
absoluthamm

absoluthamm

<==Poker Face
Silver Level
Joined
May 5, 2008
Total posts
5,692
Awards
1
Chips
0
Well like i said, i was in a casino the other night and played 5/10 and found it far easier. You can read so much better at where you are. You have zero chance of knowing where you are at micros most of the time. The amount of times when the flop has came and people have gone all-in with basically just the lowest card on the board is un-real. Would this happen at the higher levels? I highly doubt it. No-one is willing to calling a raise 3/4xBB with rubbish but micros its cents so nobbody cares that's my point.

Live poker is much easier than online poker IMO. People are a lot looser and you can value bet like crazy. But like luckychippy said, if you're playing for 5/10 at a B&M, why don't you just deposit some online and stop complaining, and find out for real that you're wrong. You and fx don't understand that you want those people to be calling you when you have AA/KK/AKs/QQ/.... You aren't guaranteed to win any hand, regardless of what stakes you're playing at or how big of a donkey you're up against. The point is to get those chips into the pot then value bet the shit out of it when you have a dry flop. Do you complain this much when you have AhAd and you have one caller of a 4xBB raise preflop and the flop comes JsTs9s and you get raised out of the hand?

BTW...for people at the micros, "just 6 cents" is nothing to them, but people even at the nosebleeds, "just 6k" is nothing to them as well. If you're playing within your means, then 3 or 4BB isn't going to be a significant amount and you will still have times that it is called around to you.

^^^I would disagree with that on 5nl or 10nl.
Couldn't agree more with you Poof
Hahahahah sheer class.

This thread and fx are going the way of the rigtards. So sad to see. May they rest in peace.
Also couldn't agree more with you Chippy...
 
Q

QTipDTB

DTB Coach
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Total posts
83
Chips
0
I have a free video at dragthebar.com on this type of concept.

http://www.dragthebar.com/poker-videos/viewer.php?id=556

The thing about which limit to start. Basically, you're probably going to be losing while you learn to play the game well. Because of this, you get to pay for your education while you learn. The new player starting at $1kNL will obviously lose much more while learning than the player starting at 10NL. Not only that, the average player at 1k will be much more skilled at carving up new players than the average player at 10nl. If a player wants to start learning at 1knl, that's their prerogative of course, but it makes little financial sense.

The common misconception among new players is that they need to move up where people respect their raises. They decide they can't win because no one folds to their bluffs. The truth is those are the easiest games to beat. If you can't beat those games, forget about beating the higher stakes. With poker being basically a zero sum game (minus the rake), the money a winning player makes comes from their opponent's mistakes. The opponents at the micros are making the most costly mistakes in poker and are doing it very frequently.
 
NineLions

NineLions

Advanced beginner
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Total posts
4,979
Chips
0
The thing about which limit to start. Basically, you're probably going to be losing while you learn to play the game well. Because of this, you get to pay for your education while you learn. The new player starting at $1kNL will obviously lose much more while learning than the player starting at 10NL.

.....

The common misconception among new players is that they need to move up where people respect their raises. They decide they can't win because no one folds to their bluffs. The truth is those are the easiest games to beat. If you can't beat those games, forget about beating the higher stakes. With poker being basically a zero sum game (minus the rake), the money a winning player makes comes from their opponent's mistakes. The opponents at the micros are making the most costly mistakes in poker and are doing it very frequently.

^^!!^^
 
E

eamesy4980

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Total posts
90
Chips
0
You have to ask yourself what are you playing poker for? Are you playing for fun? or for money? or both? If your playing for fun then play whatever game makes it fun. if both then find a game that is profitable for you and also fun. If playing just for the money like myself then you have to branch out. I started by playing micro stakes nlholdem. I played for few years and realised you cnat beat it simple as that. You raise with great hands get called by a few players then your chances winning are slim. you cant bluff and you have to always have better than a pair to win with the amount of callers you get. In the long run its unbeatable. So i changed game, i went played omaha hi lo. I played well and won a bit but again soon realised its hard to beat. As soon as flop comes and theyve hit a high hand they put in big bet and you cnat call with low draw and 2nd pair. Youl often get quartered and you got play it differently due to people betting you off pots if your holding no high hand. So again i changed my game. Im playing for money only. I moved to 8 game where there is every game there played 6 hands at a time. Now im a consistent winner and will always play this game. The games are soft, players are soft, very easy money. Bad beats occur yes but the bad beats are cushioned by your winnings. I suggest to look at other alternative games if you feel you cant beat the game. If your in it for money though. Razz is an easy game to win at. But gets a bit tedious. Change games, learn new games and may also help you with nl holdem in which you can go back to. Stud hi lo is also another great easy game to win at. Especially when you got 5 low cards 2 mugs only have high and they raising and reraising each other. Check out all the games and eventually youl find a game that suits you and you can win at.
 
E

eamesy4980

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Total posts
90
Chips
0
P.s you may say but i love nl holdem and only play that. I love nlholdem But when playing it comes at a cost of me losing money, playing for hours for no return, getting bad beats after bad beats i reserve my nlholdem game for live events and for 8 game. Dont let yourself get disalusioned with such a great game just because the stakes your at is full of donks. Change game, you may become a great stud player make loads money and be able to take stab at higher levels nlholdem and start playing there.
 
absoluthamm

absoluthamm

<==Poker Face
Silver Level
Joined
May 5, 2008
Total posts
5,692
Awards
1
Chips
0
I played for few years and realised you cnat beat it simple as that. You raise with great hands get called by a few players then your chances winning are slim. you cant bluff and you have to always have better than a pair to win with the amount of callers you get. In the long run its unbeatable.

Another one right here. If it is unbeatable then why are there so many respected members on CC and other sites(I'll go ahead and include myself in this) that say you are 100% completely wrong? I have built my bankroll up to triple and quadruple digits on multiple sites by working my way up through the micros and staying within my bankroll until I was able to comfortably move up. Yes, there are calling stations and overaggressive players, and I love them. Who gives a shit when their 53o makes the straight that one time when I have stacked them 5 times prior to that when they tried doing the same thing.

You mention that you can't bluff someone out of a hand, that makes me believe that you are trying to bluff way too often. It is not something that should be used on every other hand that you take to showdown. If your bluffs aren't working, then just value bet, value bet, value bet.

I will agree with you that a lot of the mixed games are easy to beat because people don't know the ins and outs of a lot of the games and Razz is one of my favorites, but that isn't where the fish are, so I don't go there often.
 
O

onemorechance

live free or die
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Total posts
2,925
Chips
0
What's with all the rigtard/god-awful posters recently?
 
Last edited:
absoluthamm

absoluthamm

<==Poker Face
Silver Level
Joined
May 5, 2008
Total posts
5,692
Awards
1
Chips
0
It's nothing new...
 
Q

QTipDTB

DTB Coach
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Total posts
83
Chips
0
http://www.pokertableratings.com/stars-player-search/BlackRain79

That's one of our new coaches at dragthebar.com

Notice he has almost 2 million hands on there at stakes of .01/.02 and .02/.05 and is crushing it over 20 bb/100. I think it's safe to say it's beatable over the long run ;)

The problem is players don't understand how to exploit their opponent's mistakes. They want to play loosely preflop and bluff. That's not a profitable strategy against opponents that refuse to fold. You want to have patience, get strong starting hands and then make solid value bets. It's the foundation to good poker, and people saying you can't beat the micros simply don't even have the footers down to start making a solid foundation to play good poker. It's not understanding the very basics of the game.
 
cjatud2012

cjatud2012

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Total posts
3,904
Chips
0
I have a free video at dragthebar.com on this type of concept.

http://www.dragthebar.com/poker-videos/viewer.php?id=556

The thing about which limit to start. Basically, you're probably going to be losing while you learn to play the game well. Because of this, you get to pay for your education while you learn. The new player starting at $1kNL will obviously lose much more while learning than the player starting at 10NL. Not only that, the average player at 1k will be much more skilled at carving up new players than the average player at 10nl. If a player wants to start learning at 1knl, that's their prerogative of course, but it makes little financial sense.

The common misconception among new players is that they need to move up where people respect their raises. They decide they can't win because no one folds to their bluffs. The truth is those are the easiest games to beat. If you can't beat those games, forget about beating the higher stakes. With poker being basically a zero sum game (minus the rake), the money a winning player makes comes from their opponent's mistakes. The opponents at the micros are making the most costly mistakes in poker and are doing it very frequently.

http://www.pokertableratings.com/stars-player-search/BlackRain79

That's one of our new coaches at dragthebar.com

Notice he has almost 2 million hands on there at stakes of .01/.02 and .02/.05 and is crushing it over 20 bb/100. I think it's safe to say it's beatable over the long run ;)

The problem is players don't understand how to exploit their opponent's mistakes. They want to play loosely preflop and bluff. That's not a profitable strategy against opponents that refuse to fold. You want to have patience, get strong starting hands and then make solid value bets. It's the foundation to good poker, and people saying you can't beat the micros simply don't even have the footers down to start making a solid foundation to play good poker. It's not understanding the very basics of the game.

qft!
 
pokerman27

pokerman27

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
753
Chips
0
http://www.pokertableratings.com/stars-player-search/BlackRain79

That's one of our new coaches at dragthebar.com

Notice he has almost 2 million hands on there at stakes of .01/.02 and .02/.05 and is crushing it over 20 bb/100. I think it's safe to say it's beatable over the long run ;)

The problem is players don't understand how to exploit their opponent's mistakes. They want to play loosely preflop and bluff. That's not a profitable strategy against opponents that refuse to fold. You want to have patience, get strong starting hands and then make solid value bets. It's the foundation to good poker, and people saying you can't beat the micros simply don't even have the footers down to start making a solid foundation to play good poker. It's not understanding the very basics of the game.

+1

Proof if needed...and it isn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top