That is the worst way to select tables imo.
The best tables are high player / flop and big pot tables because that is usually where the fish are. As you are a tight player, you want to get on these tables, wait for good hands and stack the loose fish throwing their money around. You will make a lot more doing that than swapping coolers with a bunch of nits.
Ok, I'll give it a whirl.
Also BB/100 and bb/100?. Big Bets / big blinds?
Assuming the Big Bet is twice the big blind, which is the correct stat for measuring success?
if im playing a large volume (and therefore obv tight) im going for the tables like micro suggested. if im playing 6 or less then ill go for the tight ones cos i LAG up.
If i remember well you mention on some thread you make 18bb/100, rigth?.ive never seen a respectable sized 2NL sample over 20bb/100. but yeah plenty of times youll be blessed with a 70bb/100 session, and other times youll struggle to make a cent. it all evens out
Don't use winrates to judge whether a player is bad or not, they take 1million hands or so to converge.
Just look for players with fishy stats. 64/20, 35/15s and so on. Are you really going to jib them off for a reg whos running bad?