D
Daithi
Rock Star
Silver Level
So a bad swing can hit for several thousand hands, even several ten thousand they say, yikes!
I just wonder how exactly does it manifest in the graph. Does is always exhibit the same traits?
So the apparent one would be that Net Win and All-in EV are way out of whack, Net Win being lower in the negative of course. No brainer.
But can it manifest, and I believe it can, in All-in EV and Net Win not so much out of whack and more co-ordinated. For example, sets over sets; board or 4 card flushes vs 2 pair; house over house. I would certainly consider those mainly running bad, of course there is play involved too.
My point is that everyone likes to think that they are running bad (even though they might be just playing bad) and they may oftentimes be right. It is however, very difficult to see it in the graph sometimes, as All-in EV doesn't tell much about coolers.
Is there a good way to tell a running bad session(s) from playing like shit sessions by looking at the graph?
I just wonder how exactly does it manifest in the graph. Does is always exhibit the same traits?
So the apparent one would be that Net Win and All-in EV are way out of whack, Net Win being lower in the negative of course. No brainer.
But can it manifest, and I believe it can, in All-in EV and Net Win not so much out of whack and more co-ordinated. For example, sets over sets; board or 4 card flushes vs 2 pair; house over house. I would certainly consider those mainly running bad, of course there is play involved too.
My point is that everyone likes to think that they are running bad (even though they might be just playing bad) and they may oftentimes be right. It is however, very difficult to see it in the graph sometimes, as All-in EV doesn't tell much about coolers.
Is there a good way to tell a running bad session(s) from playing like shit sessions by looking at the graph?