What do you think of Harrington's 3 to 1 rule?
In HoH: volume 2 he introduces the 3 to 1 rule for when you are in the red zone. The 3 to 1 rule says...
If you're M is exactly 3, its folded to you, you think there's a 50% chance the remaining players will fold to an all in bet, you're a 2:1 dog if called, then you should push all in.
So do you guys agree with the 3 to 1 rule? Do you always follow this rule when you are in the red zone? Btw, if you don't already know, two undercards are a 1.7:1 dog against two overcards like AK. And King 3 is a 1.5:1 dog against AQ.