Weird KK play?

M

marknz88

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Total posts
178
Chips
0
People like that get the best of me as I try to force them off what seems a weak/drawing hand only to value town my self when they flip something that has me dominated.

Im yet to learn how to play well against weak passive players :<
 
t1riel

t1riel

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 20, 2005
Total posts
6,919
Awards
1
Chips
16
He probably wanted to get paid off with his hand. It looks like it's aring table so he probably wanted to get as much money as he could with the hand. He would have been screwed if a four came on the river. I question the guy with pocket 4s calling a reraise preflop.
 
forsakenone

forsakenone

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Total posts
1,385
Chips
0
i don't see what is so weird about calling with pocket kings, act weak, get paid, sure you could run in a bigger hand but it was a risk he was willing to take and it worked. i myself would not do it.
 
t1riel

t1riel

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 20, 2005
Total posts
6,919
Awards
1
Chips
16
It's understandable if it was a ring table. If it was a tournament, I wouldn't do it.
 
xXSmuggla

xXSmuggla

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Total posts
132
Chips
0
The $2 raise at the beginning might have shown that he was trying to slow play it at first, then he kept building the pot. After the river he was scared of the flush, thats why he checked it, hoping the other guy would bluff the flush. It was a good call on his part with that flush possibility on the board.
 
Numbuh 0ne

Numbuh 0ne

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Total posts
201
Chips
0
He was trying to play the hand like a donk on purpose. Especially not raising preflop he was trying to induce someone elses raise. Just trying to extract value on the end with those small bets and used his opponents aggression against him to get him to push.
 
L

Lofwyr

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Total posts
456
Chips
0
The guy probably has a decent read on the table. He limp-raised preflop, which isn't a terribly uncommon move with kings. I just question how late he did it (4th?). So he probably had good reason to believe people behind him were spew-ey preflop. Especially the dude he stacked. He 3-bet preflop with 4's. He had to call the 4-bet for implied (dude made it too small) but his 3-bet seemed a bit too loose.

*I guess technically I might 3-bet with 4's every once in a while. But I have to imagine the guy that did it in that video was a maniac

I thought the guy with kings bet a little too light on the flop though. Probably the turn too, but things would likely have looked different if he'd bet $50 or $60 on the flop anyway.
 
IcyBlueAce

IcyBlueAce

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Total posts
790
Chips
0
The guy probably has a decent read on the table. He limp-raised preflop, which isn't a terribly uncommon move with kings. I just question how late he did it (4th?). So he probably had good reason to believe people behind him were spew-ey preflop. Especially the dude he stacked. He 3-bet preflop with 4's. He had to call the 4-bet for implied (dude made it too small) but his 3-bet seemed a bit too loose.

*I guess technically I might 3-bet with 4's every once in a while. But I have to imagine the guy that did it in that video was a maniac

I thought the guy with kings bet a little too light on the flop though. Probably the turn too, but things would likely have looked different if he'd bet $50 or $60 on the flop anyway.

That makes sense, welcome to the forums. :)
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
Meh, without knowing the specific dynamics in the game, I hate the way he played his hand. 3betting the 44 hand over limpers is standard, calling the 4bet isn't, but the 44 player may be trying to play big pots in position w a player he considers a fish. Based on the open limp and the betsizing postflop, and what appears to be poor handreading, I'd certainly be trying to play pots w this guy (and I sympathize w the river shove), but without knowing the history/table dynamics...
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
My guess would be that the BTN is a huge aggrotard and is basically raising ATC there. Guy with KK limps to induce a raise. Disagree with Sly. 3betting 44 on the BTN is not standard with a limp and raise in front of you. Without specific reads (where is KD these days btw) I'd actually say I'm never 3betting 44 in that spot.
 
zek

zek

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Total posts
314
Chips
0
I don't mind the limp if he thinks there is a good chance he'll get a raiser after him that he can go over. I hate the tiny flop and turn bets. Those are just asking for toruble. It worked out well this time but he very possibly could have been making it cheap for a flush draw and/or an A to call him down.
 
R

rollnutilt

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Total posts
171
Chips
0
A trap he set for a very aggressive player. Limping in with Kings I wouldn't recommend it unless you knew you was going to get paid off as he did.
 
lektrikguy

lektrikguy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Total posts
1,559
Chips
0
The guy probably has a decent read on the table. He limp-raised preflop, which isn't a terribly uncommon move with kings. I just question how late he did it (4th?). So he probably had good reason to believe people behind him were spew-ey preflop. Especially the dude he stacked. He 3-bet preflop with 4's. He had to call the 4-bet for implied (dude made it too small) but his 3-bet seemed a bit too loose.

*I guess technically I might 3-bet with 4's every once in a while. But I have to imagine the guy that did it in that video was a maniac

I thought the guy with kings bet a little too light on the flop though. Probably the turn too, but things would likely have looked different if he'd bet $50 or $60 on the flop anyway.

Nice call. I think you nailed it-this is exactly what I was thinking. And Welcome to CC.
 
B

bill1960

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
May 11, 2010
Total posts
4
Chips
0
I was shocked that the flop was not 44k
 
P

Pafkata

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 8, 2009
Total posts
192
Chips
0
the guy with KK, can't be scared from the flush.. Basically, the guy who called him was guaranteed to have pocket pair lower than his, because AA would raise him preflop. The guy with the 44 obviously does not have a set, because he would raise at some point flop or turn. River shove is terrible and looks bluffy... KK could have folded if the bet was 1/2 pot...
 
S

Skaplun

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Total posts
269
Chips
0
I could see this done in SH, in FR that's sick.
 
NCfoldem

NCfoldem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Total posts
259
Chips
0
There are a lot of different ways to win a hand, regardless of your hole cards. He ended up in the right place without sucking out to win. I question the play of the other guy with the pocket 4's though.
 
T

turby

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Total posts
182
Chips
0
One thing lacking here is context. Maybe its an aggro table where raises are common preflop and he limped in
 
Pascal-lf

Pascal-lf

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Total posts
3,161
Awards
1
Chips
1
I'd be more of the opinion he bet small to get max value - reminds me a lot of 2/5NL when donks bet tiny amounts in big pots after 3/4 bets pre-flop because they know that they probably have you beat and the last thing they want you to do is fold...
 
twoturntablez

twoturntablez

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Total posts
425
Chips
0
I dont think this is weird KK play, I am guilty of trying this, sometimes with aces. Getting to see a flop without an ace is nice, and when somebody raises you can always raise them back or call and let them lead out again.

You do throw the hand away sometimes, but hopefully when youre disguised you make all of the other players chips enough to offset your losses.
 
norriscjn

norriscjn

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Total posts
308
Chips
0
Well it wasnt a weird play first of all. Thats a pretty standard play in ring games. The guy should have known he had big PP if he limped and then pull a re re raise. So I could understand a call the reraise to see a flop to see if you get trips... but after that i would devinatly not bluff my chips away. Espically after he made a little bit bigger of a bet after turn he went 20 then to 30 saying i want more money out of this guy. Thats just my thinkin though.
 
C

cheddachris

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Total posts
107
Chips
0
i think he played it pretty well.... my question is what the hell was that other guy doing???? thats alot of money to put on the line for pocket 4's lol
 
IcyBlueAce

IcyBlueAce

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Total posts
790
Chips
0
Well it wasnt a weird play first of all. Thats a pretty standard play in ring games. The guy should have known he had big PP if he limped and then pull a re re raise. So I could understand a call the reraise to see a flop to see if you get trips... but after that i would devinatly not bluff my chips away. Espically after he made a little bit bigger of a bet after turn he went 20 then to 30 saying i want more money out of this guy. Thats just my thinkin though.

Limping in with kings is not standard in any game that I know of.
 
Exit141RTe1

Exit141RTe1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Total posts
1,151
Chips
0
Pretty aggressive river bet. Pocket 4's and the big bet......what's up!
 
Top