Understanding the pro's plays

Often when watching the professionals playing poker on tv I really don't understand some of the plays they make. I'm sure if anyone on here posted a hand where they made a play which involved some of the things the pros do they would get slaughtered for it. Here's an example of a hand i watched on a poker after dark cash game the other day. The hand was between Greg Mueller and Oliver Busquets. Blinds were $300/$600 and Mueller is in the sb with Busquets in the bb and it gets folded round to the sb and Mueller limps with KJo. Busquets checks his 63o. The flop comes 962r. Mueller bets $1000 and Busquets raises to $3000.

So why does he raise here? He has 2nd pair no kicker, surely no worse hands are going to call so it's not a value bet, but not many better hands are going to fold so it's not a bluff. I just don't understand why he raises here? There are numerous other times when he and other players did this kind of play i.e. raise with 2nd pair or tpwk. Can anyone explain why he made this play and in general why pro's play hand in way's that I would never play at small stakes?

"So why does he raise here? He has 2nd pair no kicker, surely no worse hands are going to call so it's not a value bet"

At the risk of sounding stupid, perhaps he is raising because he (correctly) thinks he has the best hand. doesnt matter if its 63off, the best hand is the best hand.

Some plays you can never understand,its harder when you can see the cards on tv!!

He probably knows he's getting called by worse so often and wants to make him pay for his overcards. He knows he's good and can check back the turn meaning he doesn't have to call a double/triple barrel.

High stakes play is so much more complex, don't worry about it and definitely don't model yourself on it.

Tv only shows ya selected hands. You don't know what kinda hands let up to some of those plays before you see the one that made the TV cut.

JamesTy said:

Tv only shows ya selected hands. You don't know what kinda hands let up to some of those plays before you see the one that made the TV cut.

Click to expand...

+1
Also his mid pair isnt exaclty the nuts and almost all turn cards suck for him. This is a board that misses opponents alot so raising allows him to take the pot right there most of the time.

If he calls, hes folding a ton on the river

Most pro's are playing the player not so much the cards. Mueller is tighter than tight and was only trying to steal the blinds imho, Oliver knows that.

youregoodmate said:

He probably knows he's getting called by worse so often and wants to make him pay for his overcards. He knows he's good and can check back the turn meaning he doesn't have to call a double/triple barrel.

High stakes play is so much more complex, don't worry about it and definitely don't model yourself on it.

Click to expand...

What worse hands are calling?
And yea i'm not gonna be modelling me play on theirs lol I just want t try and get some understanding of some of their plays

js520 said:

What worse hands are calling?
And yea i'm not gonna be modelling me play on theirs lol I just want t try and get some understanding of some of their plays

Click to expand...

Overcards, bottom pair type hands and straight draws maybe. Remember these guys are so aggro that they can often profitably raise the hands that we wouldn't dream of.

js520 said:

What worse hands are calling?

Click to expand...

So what are you suggesting?

He flat calls and waits to get drawn out on?

He was protecting the best hand, its not always about betting for value from worse hands.

js520 said:

Often when watching the professionals playing poker on tv I really don't understand some of the plays they make. I'm sure if anyone on here posted a hand where they made a play which involved some of the things the pros do they would get slaughtered for it. Here's an example of a hand i watched on a poker after dark cash game the other day. The hand was between Greg Mueller and Oliver Busquets. Blinds were $300/$600 and Mueller is in the sb with Busquets in the bb and it gets folded round to the sb and Mueller limps with KJo. Busquets checks his 63o. The flop comes 962r. Mueller bets $1000 and Busquets raises to $3000.

So why does he raise here? He has 2nd pair no kicker, surely no worse hands are going to call so it's not a value bet, but not many better hands are going to fold so it's not a bluff. I just don't understand why he raises here? There are numerous other times when he and other players did this kind of play i.e. raise with 2nd pair or tpwk. Can anyone explain why he made this play and in general why pro's play hand in way's that I would never play at small stakes?

Click to expand...

Ok everthing people said is correct that I saw but I also feel he is balencing his range because so often we say well he would never do this with 2nd pair on this flop now everyone has to at least consider this in his range.

#1 - It's Olivier Busquet, not Oliver, and there's only one of him playing so no "s" at the end of his name.

#2 - Busquet could easily sense shenanigins on Mueller's limp and figured him to be stronger than his limp would indicate. Maybe - easy to say now, BUT... The flop comes and again Busquet correctly deduces it is just a C-bet from Mueller (a pretty strong one at that that screams go away) and he has not hit that flop - so let's find out by coming over the top. After all, Busquet knows that Mueller knows that he literally can have any two cards since he did not have to commit more than his BB to see the flop. Mueller would have to have a 9 to crush him - making Busquet odds on favorite to have best hand. Time to bet it hard and not allow room for a suck out. Is it second nature for you to know that the odds of Mueller hitting that flop is only about 30%? It is for these guys.

#3 - You do not say what their stacks are (VERY IMPORTANT INFO)- but I find people get genuinely confused by pro play because they fail to take that into account. Look at the crazy plays at wsop or WPT final tables you see. Why did they do it? Hell, why not? They are usually sitting at a "massive" number of big blinds and can afford to shift to a LAGtard gear and spin the wheel of fortune. The worst they figure can happen is lose 2% of their stack AND cultivate an image that induces action from the other players down the road.

kinggambit86 said:

U could just say he was playing the man not the cards and he knew he had nothing

Click to expand...

I think this play is valid versus just about anyone - if you are stacked for it.

To OP. he reraised to protect his hand and see where he was at.i would have done the same thing. esp on such a crappy board. by calling he would not have any information as to his opponents strength. by reraising he can more or less get a better feeling about what is going on in combination with picking up the pot right then and there.