Too Merge or Polarize that is the Question

C

Countmein

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Total posts
33
Chips
0
Probably been done before but as I'm new to site. I'd like to know what hand ranges you merge and what hand ranges you polarize vs. different villain type.
TAG. LAG. AGGRO Fish. NIT

Probably could leave NIT off the list but might as well put it up there. I have no care for strategy vs. passive player no fun there.
Anyway please limit post to one type of player as I believe this will be an intense discussion and any post on all three could soon become a term paper.
 
RodneyC86

RodneyC86

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Total posts
592
Chips
0
I polarize against all but I merge very much vs Argo fish when I am confident I can take them on and make big calls postflop.

I think merging is really good only if you have a huge skill gap postflop or your opponent has a bluff catching tendency with medium weak hands.

Meh, my opinion maybe sucks but since no one responded....
 
C

Countmein

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Total posts
33
Chips
0
Thanks I like it. I think I merge too often. But I do like being unpredictable. My main problem is calling down implied odds hands. Some days people think I work for the site. Other day heeehawww...lol.
 
F

Frankie6636

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Total posts
99
Chips
0
Play more on Merge. They will help you out with everyothing. I really like the strucuter and players on there.
 
ILIKEFISH31

ILIKEFISH31

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Total posts
159
Chips
0
Can someone please explain the difference between merge and polarize as it pertains to one's range?
 
ILIKEFISH31

ILIKEFISH31

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Total posts
159
Chips
0
anyone? I'm still curious as to the difference.
 
G

GWU73

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Total posts
785
Chips
0
Simply put polarizing your range is playing only very strong hands and bluffs. Merging is where you add in more middle strength hands. There are some good threads here about it.
 
J

jj20002

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
777
Chips
0
merge against LAG and maybe Aggro

Probably been done before but as I'm new to site. I'd like to know what hand ranges you merge and what hand ranges you polarize vs. different villain type.
TAG. LAG. AGGRO Fish. NIT

Probably could leave NIT off the list but might as well put it up there. I have no care for strategy vs. passive player no fun there.
Anyway please limit post to one type of player as I believe this will be an intense discussion and any post on all three could soon become a term paper.

My thinking here, is that you should merge more hands against Loose agressive and Aggro fish,

but never against Tight aggressive players, they will make you pay if you do it frequently

depending the table you are playing you can include more hands like broadways or suited connectors, this is my approach here, of course, as you, i like tolearn how the more experienced face it
 
R

rumsey182

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Total posts
432
Chips
0
im sorry but this is a bit of a stupid question bc it is more a specific situation thing and not a "do this against this people and you will be god"

sorry to be really harsh but being lazy and not learning the fundamentals will lose you a lot of money
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
To have a merged or polarized range -- this is generally something that is said regarding a betting/raising range, particularly a 3-betting range preflop.

When 3-betting, the first question you must ask/answer is: Why am I 3-betting?

1. One reason to 3-bet is that some people fold too often to 3-bets. So the reason we are 3-betting is to make money off their folds. Against such a type, we generally want a polarized range. So, depending on how much they fold, we could construct a polarized range that looks something like this:

Value hands: AA, KK
Bluffs: A2s-A7s, A6o-A9o, K7s

PLEASE: Do not take this range seriously, I didn't spend any time working on it, I just made it off the top of my head.

Anyway, so this range is pretty ridiculous, as we have 12 value combos of the nuts (KK+), and like 76 or something combos of bluffs (this ratio probably isn't going to work out well in practice against anyone). But this is mega-polarized, and is ridiculously weighted toward bluffs. (Against someone who is folding way too often vs. 3-bets, we might want to start flatting AA/KK once in a while so as not to lose value with those hands. But then our range is so ridiculous, someone -- either villain or someone at the table -- is going to notice that our 3-betting range is ridiculous in this spot, and they can exploit us)

(If you want to know why we chose these hands to bluff with, it's sort of another topic, but the quick and dirty version is this: Because this guy is folding so often we want blockers to his continuing range, which is always going to include AA, KK, AK. Since we print money vs. this guy because he folds too often, we don't care what our flopability is. Vs. someone with a 20% opening range, A6o has the same hot-cold equity as QTs. But A6o is a better hand to bluff with because A. It has blockers to his continuing range and B. We can profitably flat call with QTs whereas A6o is one of the better hands we would fold.)

2. Against someone who opens wide and never folds to 3-bets, we would 3-bet him with a different range. We want good hands that play well vs. his range, hands that flop well and make good top pairs. So we use a merged 3-bet range vs. this type of villain, and it might look something like this (again, don't take this specific range too seriously):

88-AA
ATs-AKs
AJo-AKo
KTs-KQs
KJo-KQo
QJs

Here, we are not bluffing, but we are reraising a super wide value range.
 
S

ScottishMatt

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Total posts
2,394
Chips
0
Here I come on CC to try and help some newer players, thinking "hey I could help these guys out!". Little did I know Baudib was already on it. Fantastic post right there that explains the difference between merged and polarized ranges very well. I don't really have anything that I could expand on what Baudib has already said. So for anyone wanting to understand these terms go back and re-read the post above mine.

And there, you have my contribution :)
 
C

Countmein

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Total posts
33
Chips
0
Sad I just read this but so happy I did. Thankyou so much Baudib, it explains so much and you were straight to the point about it. Hopefully i'll be able to successfully use the concepts in my game.
 
Top