The Theory of Poker - David Sklansky

F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
Hi.

As I'm a big fan of discussion, and also of reading books, I figured I could try and jumpstart a discussion on books. And since everything has to start somewhere, I thought Sklansky's "Theory of Poker" to be a decent point of origin.

As the book doesn't present any specific strategies on poker ("play these starting hands", etc), but instead focuses on the very core of the game, it's hard to find good angles for discussion on this book in particular. However, I'll offer this:

I keep seeing people advicing beginners to stay away from this book ("but it's a must-read for experts"), because of the complex nature of its contents.

I disagree, with a disclaimer.

If by "beginner", you mean someone who has never played poker, or maybe only a few hands of 5-card-draw when they were 12, with their dad, then yes, that person would do well to start elsewhere. But if they know the basic rules of poker, this is a good read for anyone.

The problem with this book isn't that it's "difficult" in what it explains, it's just not written in a way that's made for casual reading. But for anyone who's gone to college or read any text-book, it's hardly more complicated than the norm. In fact, the actual math in it is not hard at all. You have to stay focused when you read it, and you need to think about some sections, but I disagree with needing lots of experience before tackling it.

There is one good reason why someone may want to hold off on reading this book, however, but it has nothing to do with the difficulty of understanding what it teaches: For sheer profitability, this book is not going to pay off as much as some other books, early on in your career as a poker player. If you're struggling to break even, and what you really want is something to help you keep your bankroll, then get some other book first, which includes some basic strategies on how and what to play for the variant of poker you're interested in. But if you're looking to build a solid foundation which will help you benefit even more from the other books you'll read, then there's no reason to hold off on buying The Theory of Poker, in my opinion. After you've read it, you'll want to from time to time go back and re-read sections or the whole book. And if you really want to do your homework, you'd do well - while reading a suggested strategy by a different author - to cross check Sklansky's reasoning to see how it fits in. But don't let people scare you into thinking it's too much to muster.
 
X

xdmanx007

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Total posts
1,813
Awards
1
Chips
4
Quite likely my favorite book on the subject! The main problem with other books is they try to give you a cut and dry way to play certain hands in certain situations which is beneficial to beginning players. Theory of poker takes the approach of applying a theory and using the available information in a hand to determine the BEST way to play, and that the game must be looked at from a longterm perspective not winning each and every hand you play.
 
beardyian

beardyian

Scary Clown
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Total posts
15,845
Awards
2
Chips
0
I have in fact just gotten myself a copy of this as well as :adore:Mr Brunsons Super System 2.
Having heard about its leaning towards the Maths more and being very strong in maths myself i look forward to taking over the world soon ;) :D.

People often overlook the titles though "Theory" and "System" do not expect to become an instant winner these are suggesting the ways that should help you win more often.

After all a cook book wont make the cake :confused: well i know what i meant :).

IanT
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
If poker books were cook books, Theory of Poker explains what happens to the meat when you turn up the heat.
 
K

KidHavok

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Total posts
80
Chips
0
I have about 10 poker books and i hate to say this, but I have only learned from about 3 pages on information from any 1 book. I agree with the statment made earlier, the books are so unsituational. It is really hard to find a book that makes you a winnner automatically. No book can do that, only losing $K's can really help you understand situational poker. Another thing the book's have totally missed is the way to win real money.... How to play when your table is on TILT!!!!!!!! I dont know how to do it, unless its just the ram and jam way...
 
Grumbledook

Grumbledook

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Total posts
1,750
Chips
0
This is one book that I keep going back and rereading, that and his tournament poker book.
 
Sky Casino
Top