As with most aspects of poker we're dealing with incomplete information, and in practising table selection we just have to come to the best judgment we can based on what information we have. For example, Valda III has a high players/flop%, but a low average pot. The players/flop% may well be skewed in this instance by many of the
hands used in producing these stats being shorthanded (which would probably explain the 'low' avg pot). Obviously I'd be more comfortable choosing after observing the tables, even if only for 5 minutes, but I get the feeling that isn't the point of this thread.
Accounting for the probable skew affecting Valda III, Jugda's $9/34% looks the most appealing.
Hands/hr is usually the least important stat in the lobby. Generally, more hands/hr imply nittier play at the tables anyway.