Short Handed Limit Holdem AK vs Maniac

Marklar

Marklar

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 18, 2006
Total posts
186
Chips
0
Do you think its smart to take AK (or any good ace) to showdown against a maniac? I've done it several times and each time I took the pot down I felt like a genius.

Against one guy I even took KJ to showdown and took it down withing King high. I've been watching this one player the whole session he played everyhand, raising preflop almost everytime. If he didnt raise preflop he bet the flop no matter what came out. Alot of his hands were something like 62 or T4. However it seemed like I was the only one at the table to take marginal hands to showdown against him.

personally I love short handed limit.
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
The board would have to be really, really ugly for me to fold AK vs. a truly loose and aggressive player at any point. I don't make a habit of showing down K-high, but it's happened.

personally I love short handed limit.
Oh, me too. The variance is horrible, but the profits are awesome.
 
A

acehigh18

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Total posts
16
Chips
0
Yeah I like short handed games too. Its easier to pull out the best hand, at least i think it is. I have definetely had better luck with them but i do good at regular tables too
 
edge-t

edge-t

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Total posts
365
Chips
0
Do you have to play a lot looser on short-handed?
 
Marklar

Marklar

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 18, 2006
Total posts
186
Chips
0
Oh, me too. The variance is horrible, but the profits are awesome

Yep more bad beats. You know you're going to have a bad day when this happens

POKERSTARS GAME #8302877963: HOLD'EM LIMIT ($2/$4) - 2007/02/06 - 00:30:32 (ET)
Table 'Joella' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 2: KidNeil ($89 in chips)
Seat 3: lasagna*oka* ($128 in chips)
Seat 4: jogk ($41 in chips)
Seat 5: _Marklar_22 ($52 in chips)
Seat 6: August West ($75 in chips)
August West: posts small blind $1
KidNeil: posts big blind $2
jogk: posts small & big blinds $3
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to _Marklar_22 [2s Ac]
lasagna*oka*: folds
jogk: checks
_Marklar_22: calls $2
August West: folds
KidNeil: checks
*** FLOP *** [Kc As 7d]
KidNeil: checks
jogk: checks
_Marklar_22: bets $2
KidNeil: folds
jogk: calls $2
*** TURN *** [Kc As 7d] [5c]
jogk: checks
_Marklar_22: bets $4
jogk: calls $4
*** RIVER *** [Kc As 7d 5c] [5s]
jogk: bets $4
_Marklar_22: calls $4
*** SHOW DOWN ***
jogk: shows [Qc 5h] (three of a kind, Fives)
_Marklar_22: mucks hand
jogk collected $27 from pot
_Marklar_22 said, "god"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $28 | Rake $1
Board [Kc As 7d 5c 5s]
Seat 2: KidNeil (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: lasagna*oka* folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: jogk showed [Qc 5h] and won ($27) with three of a kind, Fives
Seat 5: _Marklar_22 (button) mucked [2s Ac]
Seat 6: August West (small blind) folded before Flop
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
Do you have to play a lot looser on short-handed?
Not a "lot" looser, but looser, yes. And more aggressive preflop, although not necessarily postflop.
 
edge-t

edge-t

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Total posts
365
Chips
0
Not a "lot" looser, but looser, yes. And more aggressive preflop, although not necessarily postflop.

Ahh... so you loosen your starting hand requirements and tighten up post flop. If you hit the flop say medium pair and good kicker, do you call the way down to the river? Cause I've been trying out .25/.5 FL 9max at Doyles recently. IT's not 6 max, but they are way loose... calling with bottom pair and bad bad kicker all the way down to river. I can't imagine what playing 6 max low-limit will be like.

I better stick to micro NL tables...
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
I don't think I necessarily tighten up postflop. The thing is, that so many players at my table play recklessly postflop (because it's shorthanded and they think they have to) that I'd miss out on a lot of money if I didn't exploit that. So it's opponent-dependent, as almost everything is.
 
S

Sharpcushaw

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Total posts
12
Chips
0
AK is usually good to showdown against a maniac.
 
W

Warui Guy

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Total posts
24
Chips
0
AK vs maniac happens to me a whole lot. Funny how I almost always lose to an idiot with 72 or 83 off. Is there no justice in the world ?
 
A

anilag

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Total posts
16
Chips
0
If you're sure the guy's a maniac, yeah.

I've seen many limit players take AK to showdown against a new player or even a tight one. Guess that makes them a little maniac, heh.
 
Starting Hands - Poker Hand Nicknames Rankings - Poker Hands Live Dealer Holdem - Texas Holdem Poker Rules
Top